Britain’s nuclear power huge investment needed without govt subsidy
Mr Huhne yesterday reiterated his sceptical position about new reactors, telling BBC News that they would go ahead only if energy companies were prepared to invest without any new government subsidy, and warning: “No new nuclear power station has been built without new public subsidy for a very long time.”
Billions likely to be spent on nuclear power, FT.com, By Ed Crooks, Energy editor May 14 2010 Tens of billions of pounds of investment in new nuclear power stations can still go ahead, in spite of the appointment of the Liberal Democrats’ Chris Huhne as energy secretary, industry executives said yesterday.The Lib Dem manifesto committed the party to “reject a new generation of nuclear power stations”, arguing that they would be more expensive than energy-saving measures or renewables such as wind power. Mr Huhne yesterday reiterated his sceptical position about new reactors, telling BBC News that they would go ahead only if energy companies were prepared to invest without any new government subsidy, and warning: “No new nuclear power station has been built without new public subsidy for a very long time.”
However, the energy companies looking at making investments of £40bn-plus to build up to 12 new nuclear power stations in Britain said that they were reassured by the details of the coalition agreement.
Vincent de Rivaz, chief executive of the UK arm of EDF, the French energy group that plans to build the first new reactor in Britain for more than 20 years, described Mr Huhne as “a man we can do business with”.,,,,,,,,,,,
Andrew Warren, the director of the Association for the Conservation of Energy, who has been an adviser to the Lib Dems on energy policy, said more efficient use of power would be a much cheaper solution.
“We could supply all the heat, light and power we need using half the amount of fuel we currently consume, using existing technology. That would remove the need for new nuclear plants and many other new power stations besides,” he said.
FT.com / Energy – Billions likely to be spent on nuclear power
No comments yet.
-
Archives
- December 2025 (268)
- November 2025 (359)
- October 2025 (377)
- September 2025 (258)
- August 2025 (319)
- July 2025 (230)
- June 2025 (348)
- May 2025 (261)
- April 2025 (305)
- March 2025 (319)
- February 2025 (234)
- January 2025 (250)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- Atrocities
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Events
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- Weekly Newsletter
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS


Leave a comment