Vested interests controlling study on uranium mining impacts?
Virginia currently has a moratorium on uranium mining and milling.
Tobacco Commission Gets Process Rolling For Socioeconomic Uranium Mining Study The Gazette Virginian, JOHN R. CRANE/Danville Register & Bee. 20 April 2010 The process has begun for the second part of a study focusing on the socioeconomic impacts of uranium mining and milling in Virginia. The Virginia Tobacco Commission’s executive committee voted Thursday during its meeting in Roanoke to recommend the commission supply up to $200,000 to the Virginia Coal and Energy Commission’s Uranium Mining Subcommittee to pay an entity to perform the socioeconomic study.
“We want to make sure that there was independent funding so this would have validity,” Tobacco Commission Executive Committee Chairman Delegate Terry Kilgore said Thursday.The Tobacco Commission will meet April 29, said Kilgore, R-1st District, who also heads the Virginia Coal and Energy Commission…………….
Virginia Uranium Inc., which seeks to mine and mill a 119-million pound uranium ore deposit at Coles Hill near Chatham, is paying for the study’s first part emphasizing the technical and scientific aspects of mining and milling. The National Academy of Sciences and National Research Council are performing that study, which is expected to be finished in the fall of 2011.
Virginia currently has a moratorium on uranium mining and milling.
Patrick Wales, VUI geologist and spokesman, praised the vote as the first step toward completing the mission that the Coal and Energy Commission assigned to the uranium subcommittee.
Eloise Nenon, a mining opponent and founding member of Southside Concerned Citizens in Chatham, said the decision was “great” but added public participation in the study should be allowed. The study should also examine the threats uranium mining and milling could pose to the area’s history, agriculture, air, water and public health, Nenon said. Tobacco Commission Gets Process Rolling For Socioeconomic Uranium Mining Study
No comments yet.
-
Archives
- December 2025 (236)
- November 2025 (359)
- October 2025 (377)
- September 2025 (258)
- August 2025 (319)
- July 2025 (230)
- June 2025 (348)
- May 2025 (261)
- April 2025 (305)
- March 2025 (319)
- February 2025 (234)
- January 2025 (250)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- Atrocities
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Events
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- Weekly Newsletter
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS


Leave a comment