Toxic financial loans to nuclear industry
Nuclear power, strike 2 MNN – Mother Nature Network Karl Burkart 15 Feb 2010 Even Wall Street won’t touch nuclear because it is too financially risky. At least 1 out of 2 nuclear plants will fail, leaving taxpayers with the burden of debt.Sun, Feb 14 2010
If you think mortgage derivative assets were toxic, take a look at this factoid from the CBO (Congressional Budget Office) on financing new nuclear plants using federal loan guarantees:CBO considers the risk of default on such a loan guarantee to be very high-well above 50 percent. The key factor accounting for this risk is that we expect that the plant would be uneconomic to operate because of its high construction costs, relative to other electricity generation sources.Investors won’t touch nuclear with a 10′ spent fuel rod. It just costs too much and construction costs can get wildly out of control. Take the proposed NGR plant in San Antonio which was estimated at a modest $5.4 billion and set to receive one of Obama’s nuclear loan guarantees… that was until the final construction estimates came in at $17 billion.The current program, according to Daniel Weiss at Grist, will make the government responsible for 80% of a defaulted loan. With an $8 billion per plant price tag and 50% default rate, the program could stick taxpayers with billions in debt. As Weiss explains, Obama tripled the previous (2005) nuclear loan guarantee program which more than triples the risk to the American people:Tripling of the loan guarantees is also dubious political strategy because it provides huge subsidies for nuclear power without securing the support of pro-nuclear senators for comprehensive, bipartisan global warming pollution reduction legislation…During this time of trillion dollar deficits, this is a very imprudent use of taxpayers’ money.
No comments yet.
-
Archives
- December 2025 (286)
- November 2025 (359)
- October 2025 (377)
- September 2025 (258)
- August 2025 (319)
- July 2025 (230)
- June 2025 (348)
- May 2025 (261)
- April 2025 (305)
- March 2025 (319)
- February 2025 (234)
- January 2025 (250)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- Atrocities
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Events
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- Weekly Newsletter
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS



Leave a comment