nuclear-news

The News That Matters about the Nuclear Industry Fukushima Chernobyl Mayak Three Mile Island Atomic Testing Radiation Isotope

A Nuclear Power Is About to Fall to Islamists

Joel HillikerColumnist A Nuclear Power Is About to Fall to Islamists
May 6, 2009 | From theTrumpet.com Radical Muslims are closer to the nuclear bomb than we’d like: only 60 miles. Pakistan is turning into the Iranian Revolution—plus nuclear weapons.
The immediate danger is heightened exponentially by Pakistan being one of the world’s eight nuclear powers, possessing between 60 and 100 nukes, scattered throughout the country. Amid escalating chaos, some of those bombs are sure to slip into extremist Muslim hands……………..

A Nuclear Power Is About to Fall to Islamists | Columns | theTrumpet.com

May 7, 2009 Posted by | Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Another contentious issue, another phony nuclear consultation

Issues: Another contentious issue, another phony consultation Nuclear Consultations VUE WEEKLY Ricardo Acuña  Why bother? Does anyone in Alberta really believe that “consultations” and “expert panel” reports generated by the provincial government are ever anything more than attempts to whitewash contentious issues and unpopular policies? Yet the government continues to spend millions of dollars on these public relations exercises, and continues to try pass them off as genuine and objective consultations.

The latest supposed information gathering and public consultation effort launched by the government is no different. When Albertans responded loudly and angrily to a proposal from Ontario’s Bruce Power to build up to four nuclear reactors in northern Alberta, the government sought to quell the outcry by assuring us that they would not take a position on nuclear power without first studying the pros and cons in depth and fully consulting the public.
As always, the first step in this process was the appointment of an “expert panel” to produce a “comprehensive and balanced” research report, which would look at the environmental, safety and myriad other issues related to nuclear power generation.

Unfortunately, the panel itself was neither comprehensive nor balanced. The panel is chaired by Harvie Andre, a former Conservative MP who remains closely allied with pro-nuclear Conservatives, including Stephen Harper. Also on the panel is John Luxat, who is a past president of the Canadian Nuclear Society, and a current board member of Atomic Energy of Canada Limited (AECL). Rounding out the panel are Joseph Doucet, an energy policy professor from the University of Alberta, and Harrie Vredenburg, a prof from the University of Calgary who has done work in the past for energy companies holding a direct stake in Bruce Power.

Missing from the panel were any environmental researchers, any health professionals and generally anyone who might be critical or provide a different perspective to that being presented by the nuclear industry. In fact, when Dr. Helen Caldicott, one of the world’s leading researchers on the health impacts of nuclear energy, was in Alberta recently she offered to meet with Harvie Andre and the entire panel, but her offer was refused by panel chair Andre…………….

The panel’s report heavily downplayed the environmental and health impacts of nuclear energy, focusing instead on nuclear energy as a low-carbon-emission source of electricity. To achieve that claim, the report ignores the full life-cycle emissions of nuclear power, which includes mining and transportation.

There was no mention in the report of peer-reviewed studies from Germany citing higher cancer rates in children living near nuclear plants, nor was there mention of the issue of radioactive emissions from reactors, including tritium. The risk assessment in the report was based on a small 800 megawatt reactor, despite the fact that what is being proposed in Alberta is up to 4000 megawatts of generation. The costs of nuclear generation were also downplayed, focusing only on the direct costs of generation and not including the full life-cycle costs of plants, including construction and decommissioning. These are the costs that have Ontario citizens still paying a premium on their monthly electricity bills to subsidize their nuclear power plants, which have never actually run at anywhere near 100 per cent of capacity…………..
………………… In short, the panel’s research report reads like a public relations document for nuclear power that would make Mr. Burns of The Simpsons proud. The government is now using this report as the foundation for its public consultation exercise…………………
……..Nuclear energy is an issue that demands public discussion, input and dialogue. It is an issue that requires an understanding of all the risks and implications. To tackle this issue by way of a glorified public relations campaign and consultations with predetermined results is an insult to Albertans, and does significant damage to the public interest

Vue Weekly : Edmonton’s 100% Independent Weekly : Issues: Another contentious issue, another phony consultation

May 7, 2009 Posted by | Canada, secrets,lies and civil liberties | , , , | Leave a comment

Radiation Authority Sees Serious Safety Problems at Olkiluoto,Nuclear Building Site

Radiation Authority Sees Serious Safety Problems at Nuclear Building Site Uutiset 7 May 09

The Finnish Nuclear and Radiation Safety Authority STUK says that the construction of the commercial nuclear reactor in Olkiluoto, which is to be the world’s largest, has not proceeded according to official requirements.

STUK has demanded that the builder of the installation, the French company Areva, correct faults with the automation that guides the reactor……………….. According to STUK, the design of the automation does not meet the basic principles required for nuclear safety, and on this basis STUK does not see any possibilities to approve the automation for installation at Olkiluoto.

Radiation Authority Sees Serious Safety Problems at Nuclear Building Site | News | YLE Uutiset | yle.fi

May 7, 2009 Posted by | Finland, safety | , , , | Leave a comment

Spent nuclear material focus of IAEA meeting

Spent nuclear material focus of meeting VIENNA, May 6 (UPI) — The International Atomic Energy Agency is planning to host a multinational meeting in Vienna to address the safety and security of spent nuclear material. The IAEA meeting, scheduled for May 11-20,…….
………According to an IAEA news release, the meeting will focus on long-term challenges, “such as the management of spent fuel, the disposal of high-level radioactive waste and the need to find suitable disposal options for all types of radioactive waste.”

Spent nuclear material focus of meeting – Middle East Times

May 7, 2009 Posted by | Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Concern coming over states dumping nuclear waste in Utah

Concern coming over states dumping nuclear waste in Utah SALT LAKE CITY (ABC 4 News) May 7, 2009 –– A new study shows several states may dumping nuclear waste in Utah when they could be doing it in their own backyard.

An Associated Press analysis of U.S. Department of Energy records shows three states with their own radioactive waste dump have shipped millions of cubic feet of waste this decade to a private facility in Utah that’s the only one available to 36 other states.

Concern coming over states dumping nuclear waste in Utah – ABC 4.com – Salt Lake City, Utah News

May 7, 2009 Posted by | Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Russia Plans a Deadly Mix of Offshore Oil Drilling and Floating Nuclear Reactors in the Arctic

Russia plans a deadly mix of off-shore drilling and floating nuclear reactors Red,Green and Blue by Mridul Chadha

Published on May 6th, 2009

Russia is planning to build floating and submersible nuclear reactors to power oil drilling platforms which it intends to use to extract the untouched oil and gas reverses of the Arctic……………………………..Of possibly greater concern is the radioactive waste dumped at sea. Russian authorities told Dr. Hollister that 11,000 to 17,000 waste containers, holding 61,407 curies of radioactivity, were dumped off Novaya Zemlya from 1964 to 1990. In addition, 165,000 cubic meters of liquid waste were dumped in the Barents Sea west of Novaya Zemlaya from 1961 to 1990. For comparison, the Chernobyl accident released about 86,000,000 curies of radioactivity.Dr. Hollister reckons the amount of nuclear material within some of the Soviet sunken submarines at seven times that in the ill-fated Chernobyl reactor.

The Norwegian environmental group Bellona reported two years ago that some of the nuclear waste dumped in sea is at risk of exploding. The group reported corrosion in the storage tanks which have spent fuel rods inside.

While the Russian point to the benefits of small nuclear plants and fall back on the vast experience of operating nuclear powered ships, there are no guarantees that the nuclear waste generated will not be dumped into the sea,

Russia Plans a Deadly Mix of Offshore Oil Drilling & Floating Nuclear Reactors in the Arctic : Red, Green, and Blue

May 7, 2009 Posted by | Russia, safety | Leave a comment

US, Australia and China should work together to secure future

US, Australia and China should work together to secure future Science Alert , 07 May 2009 By Stewart Taggart As the US cedes global economic primacy, Australia mulls a military buildup and China struggles with crippling pollution. One big issue facing all countries is how to ensure Asian regional stability.Buying ships and jets won’t do it, particularly if trying to match the Chinese.A more farsighted approach is to use the next 20 years of geopolitical transition to bind the Asian hemisphere into a ubiquitous, universally-beneficial energy delivery system.This offers everyone a slice of the pie and a stake in stability: the Americans, the Chinese, the Australians, the Southeast Asian nations.In “Australia 2050, Clean Energy Superpower”, DESERTEC-Australia argues for a pan-hemispheric High-Voltage Direct Current power line and natural gas pipeline network stretching from the Great Australian Bight to Beijing and beyond.Through it could flow everything from Southern Ocean wave energy ……………………………

Through it could flow everything from Southern Ocean wave energy to Mongolian wind power, all ‘load balanced’ by natural gas and cross-border hydropower. In short, Asia could have the ultimate multilateral ‘smart grid.’

The benefits would be huge: more efficient transport of energy, greater security of energy supply, better price signals for investment, dramatic reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. The technology is there, the money is there, the brains are there, and the renewable energy is there.

America has an edge in innovation and risk-tolerant capital investment (i.e. venture capital). Australia has an edge in renewable energy resources. China has an edge in High Voltage Direct Current power lines, and soon Ultra High Voltage Power lines.

Therein lies the solution: use American expertise in risk-tolerant capital to fund renewable energy experimentation throughout Asia, including Australia, with the Chinese providing the multilateral energy ‘superhighway’ comprised of High Voltage Direct Current power lines and natural gas pipelines……………………..

A recent US study “A Roadmap for U.S.-China Cooperation on Energy and Climate Change” noted the United States and China had in common large renewable energy resources and aging, inefficient energy transmission infrastructures. The same can be said for Australia. Therefore, the templates and roadmaps are there for cooperation.

DESERTEC-Australia estimates fitting out Australia with a transcontinental High Voltage Direct Current transmission system and a unified national gas pipeline system would cost about A$30 billion, or three per cent of Australian GDP. That’s significantly less than Prime Minister Kevin Rudd’s proposed $42 billion national broadband system.

US, Australia and China should work together to secure future (ScienceAlert)

May 7, 2009 Posted by | Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Taking on the Taliban | The Australian

Taking on the Taliban

THE AUSTRALIAN 7  May 09 Any Taliban success in nuclear-armed Pakistan would be a disaster for the Western world.Following September 11, the US invaded Afghanistan and removed the Taliban government that had harboured al-Qa’ida, but president George W.Bush, distracted by Iraq, failed to finish the job. Mr Obama, with the help of NATO and Australia, must defeat the Taliban now. The terrorists are intent on creating a clerical dictatorship and using it as base to fight the world.It would be a disaster if they succeeded in Afghanistan, and a catastrophe if they imposed their authority on any Pakistani province.

Taking on the Taliban | The Australian

May 7, 2009 Posted by | Uncategorized | Leave a comment

NTI: Global Security Newswire – Australia Breaks with U.S. on Missile Defense

Australia Breaks with U.S. on Missile Defense NTI May 6, 2009 * The Australian government on Saturday expressed its categorical opposition to national ballistic missile shields, the Sydney Morning Herald reported The position — buried in a 140-page defense white paper — represents a break from the United States and put Australia in the same camp as China and Russia on the question of missile defense………………….Opposition to missile shields is part of the platform of Prime Minister Kevin Rudd’s Labor Party.

NTI: Global Security Newswire – Australia Breaks with U.S. on Missile Defense

May 7, 2009 Posted by | Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Egypt drops U.S. construction giant Bechtel as nuclear consultant

Egypt drops U.S. construction giant Bechtel as nuclear consultant
The Canadian Press 5 may 09 CAIRO — Egypt’s Electricity Ministry says it has dropped U.S. construction giant Bechtel as a consultant for the country’s first nuclear reactor.The state-run news agency quoted a ministry statement Sunday as saying it has chosen Australia’s WorleyParsons for the 10-year consultancy.

The Canadian Press: Egypt drops U.S. construction giant Bechtel as nuclear consultant

May 7, 2009 Posted by | Uncategorized | Leave a comment

US spies&squo; anger over China antennae deal | The Daily Telegraph

US spies’ anger over China antennae deal

The Daily Telegraph By Piers Akerman

May 05, 2009

A $10 MILLION contract let by the CSIRO to a Chinese Government subsidiary threatens the security of a new American military communications base in Australia, US officials believe……………………

The source said the West seemed to be falling over itself to overlook China’s history of supplying nuclear secrets to rogue states like North Korea, which recently tested a missile system capable of delivering a nuclear warhead, and to rogue scientists like Pakistan’s Dr Doom, Abdul Qadeer Khan.

US spies&squo; anger over China antennae deal | The Daily Telegraph

May 7, 2009 Posted by | Uncategorized | Leave a comment