nuclear-news

We must learn to live with wind power

We must learn to live with wind power

Telegraph By Erin Gill
Last Updated: 7:13PM GMT 26 Mar 2009

The zealous backing given to wind farms this week by Ed Miliband, the Climate Change Secretary, and the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, has stirred up the usual protests about the beautiful British landscape being papered over with metallic monstrosities. But arguing against wind energy is, well, a waste of energy. Denouncing wind turbines in favour of another technology, such as nuclear, tidal and wave, solar or even “cleaner” coal is missing the point. The argument is over.

………………………….There are two standard objections to wind turbines. The first is that wind farms generate negligible amounts of electricity, and cost more carbon to produce than they save. This is a myth: the typical 3MW turbine powers 1,700 homes annually and “pays back” the energy – and saves the carbon emissions – expended to manufacture, transport, install and commission it in a mere six months.

The next objection is aesthetic: we don’t want turbines in our back yards, or in the picturesque areas we like to visit…………………………The future is not a vast forest of wind turbines obliterating every prized view,………………………..In fact, wind turbines can add sparkle to lacklustre locations.

We must learn to live with wind power – Telegraph

March 27, 2009 - Posted by Christina Macpherson | ENERGY, UK