Waste Texas
Waste Texas The Texas Observer 7 March 09 Peggy Pryor grew up the poor daughter of a roughneck, maligned as “oilfield trash,” but she prides herself on having good horse sense. For more than a decade, this feisty West Texas woman has seen something terribly wrong with plans to turn a former ranch near her hometown into the final resting place for massive amounts of radioactive and hazardous waste. Not too many years ago, Pryor could be found raising hell trying to stop the dump. These days, she’s more or less resigned to the inevitable.
“I still protest every once in a while,” she says. But in the end, “I don’t think I did anything other than scream and yell, and cause them to have a little headache.”
The corporation Pryor tried to fight, Waste Control Specialists LLC, owned by Dallas billionaire and major Republican donor Harold Simmons, has spent the last 20 years pulling political, business, and regulatory strings to do what no other company in the nation has been able to do in three decades: license and build a new radioactive waste dump. Waste Control has lobbied successfully for a change in state law to privatize radioactive waste disposal, muscled out more experienced competitors, beaten back environmentalists and anti-nuclear activists, and—perhaps most remarkably—turned the majority of Andrews’ citizens into the dump’s fiercest boosters.
The company now has in hand—a technicality or two notwithstanding—two licenses to bury about 60 million cubic feet of low-level radioactive waste at a site near the Texas-New Mexico line 30 miles west of Andrews. Much of the waste will be radioactive for millions of years; projected profits have been estimated in the billions…………………………..Waste Control prevailed. In 2003, after several failed attempts, the company finally convinced the Texas Legislature, lubricated by campaign contributions and a team of lobbyists, to change state law to allow a private outfit to handle radioactive waste. With that accomplished, Waste Control spent the next five years navigating an environmental and safety review by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality that Waste Control President Rod Baltzer calls “one of the most rigorous reviews in the history of mankind.”That process is now almost complete. Andrews is on its way to becoming the nation’s preeminent radioactive waste destination. Still, the company is chafing at the limitations imposed by the disposal licenses.
For Pryor, the idea of letting a for-profit company handle, transport, and bury waste that will remain dangerous for tens of thousands of years is crazy at best. State engineers and geologists largely agree. (See “Good to Glow,” April 4, 2008) They’ve publicly predicted the landfill will contaminate groundwater and pose unacceptable risks to residents. At least three state experts have quit the environmental commission in the past two years to protest what they see as politically motivated fast-tracking of Waste Control’s licenses.
Americans are exposed to seven times more radiation
Americans are exposed to seven times more radiationTop News by Piyush Diwan on Wed, 03/04/2009 Recent research revealed that Americans are seven times more exposed to radiation than in 1980. The possible reason behind this increase is overuse of a diagnostic scans by doctors for profit.Research conducted by National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurement said that doctors are ordering too many diagnostic tests, driving up the cost of healthcare in the United States and potentially harming patients. Researchers believe that too much radiation exposure can cause cancer, especially in younger people.Dr. James Thrall, chair of the American College of Radiology’s Board of Chancellors, said: “Unfortunately, one of the things we have seen in the imaging world is that many physicians look at imaging as the solution to their financial problems.”
Americans are exposed to seven times more radiation | Top News
News Headlines Increase Radiation Risks – More people go to the doctor if they are panicked – Softpedia
News Headlines Increase Radiation Risks SOFTPEDIA 7 March 09 More people go to the doctor if they are panicked – “……………………doctors say, patients are prone to getting more exposed to radiation after news programs and various daily papers tell that a disease is on the rise, or other such information……………………“Adding up all the doses and then spreading out the total over the entire population, no matter a person’s age, occupation, location, or health status is not appropriate for assessing risk to the general population,” Mayo Clinic professor of radiological physics Cynthia McCollough shares.
window.google_render_ad();While trying to keep healthy, people actually tend to get intoxicated with unnecessary doses of radiation, just to make sure that whatever disease is circulating the country at one point is not affecting them.
Bloomberg.com: Australia & New Zealand
By Shani Raja 3 March Sydney. Energy Resources of Australia Ltd. (ERA AU): Uranium slumped about 9 percent last week after supply exceeded demand on the so- called spot market for the first time this year, Denver-based pricing service TradeTech LLC said in a report.Energy Resources, a uranium producer, fell 1.1 percent to A$18.19.
First, tag your shark. Then have an informed debate – Letters – Opinion
Efficiency beats nuclear as realistic route on emissionsHeather Ridout (Letters, March 4) says most actions to reduce emissions involve costs that, in the main, will not be recovered by energy savings.Modelling by McKinsey and Company shows that potential energy savings are substantial and that reducing emissions to 30 per cent below 1990 levels by 2020 is affordable and does not require major technological breakthroughs or lifestyle changes (“Going green for 80 cents a day”, February 15, 2008).Their work suggests savings from energy efficiency can pay for most of the additional costs of cleaner energy supply. Energy efficiency is not just about turning the lights off. It includes addressing market failures, such as the lack of incentive for builders to install insulation in rental homes where tenants foot the power bills.
Gayle Adams Dulwich Hill
There are many reports and real life examples to show that large amounts of energy could be saved cost-effectively by being more efficient. In particular, we should be targeting inefficient industrial electric motor systems, commercial air handling systems and commercial lighting.
The Federal Government’s report Securing Australia’s Energy Future (2004) outlines that energy usage could be reduced by 10 to 30 per cent, saving $5 billion to $15 billion a year. Other reports show that such savings can be achieved by investing in energy efficiency projects with payback periods of less than four years. Projects with longer payback periods can save substantially more energy.
Energy efficiency can deliver dollar savings which can be used to reduce carbon emissions further by investing in renewable energy.
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Peter Costello’s support for nuclear power is misguided. Sydney Morning Herald, 6 March 09The 2006 Switkowski report found that even building 25 nuclear reactors by 2050 would reduce emissions by a modest 17 per cent, assuming they replaced coal-fired plants. The reactors would cost $50-$100 billion and they would produce 45,000 tonnes of high-level nuclear waste.
They would also produce enough plutonium to build 45,000 nuclear weapons, bringing Australia far closer to a nuclear weapons capability and possibly encouraging countries in South-East Asia to move closer to a weapons capability under the guise of a civil nuclear program. Jim Green Friends of the Earth, Melbourne
First, tag your shark. Then have an informed debate – Letters – Opinion
-
Archives
- January 2026 (16)
- December 2025 (358)
- November 2025 (359)
- October 2025 (377)
- September 2025 (258)
- August 2025 (319)
- July 2025 (230)
- June 2025 (348)
- May 2025 (261)
- April 2025 (305)
- March 2025 (319)
- February 2025 (234)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- Atrocities
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Events
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- Weekly Newsletter
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS

