nuclear-news

The News That Matters about the Nuclear Industry Fukushima Chernobyl Mayak Three Mile Island Atomic Testing Radiation Isotope

Green Glow Renaissance: Global Nuclear Genocide

The nuclear industry seized on the “peak oil” and “global warming” crisis which they created and turned it to their advantage.  They call nuclear a “green”, “clean”, “renewable” resource because they can reuse the deadly waste to make nuclear weapons.  They lump it under with wind and solar.  The theme of the Canadian Nuclear Association CNA convention and trade show from February 25 to 27 at the Westin in Ottawa is “the reality of renaissance”.  [Is that crazy or what?]  Yes, they rely on our ignorance and naivety. ………………..They want to build dozens of nuclear reactors all over the world in Indigenous communities along and dump the nuclear waste for us to “manage”!!  We live in remote areas far from any place they would want to even visit. …………………….

Meanwhile, Canada helps set up private organizations as government fronts like CNA (Canadian Nuclear Association), NWMO (Nuclear Waste Management Organization) and CAP (Congress of Aboriginal People) and OMAA (Ontario Metis and Aboriginal Association).  The latter two are so-called “aboriginal” organizations.  NWMO and CNA are funding the Assembly of First Nations, another government set up, and CAP to talk us into managing and storing nuclear fuel waste on our territories.  Meetings have gone on for years to get Elders and “leaders” on side.  Canada has even sent in Mother Joan Holmes to turn non-natives into “Indians” who can then sign away our inherent rights.  Nuclear salesmen are courting “Aboriginal partners” to sign away our birthright and existence.

So-called 34-year old “aboriginal”, Patrick “Fabio-Wannabe” Brazeau, was recently appointed Senator by Canadian Prime Minister Stephen “Ford-Modelling-Agent” Harper.  What was this all about?  Brazeau’s rap sheet looks like the antithesis of anything anyone would want in the Senate.  He was rewarded for fronting the phony CAP to try to destroy Indigenous nations and sovereignty.

CAP has arrangements with NRC (Natural Resources Canada) and NWMO to consider nuclear waste management on or near our communities.  Brazeau proposed, “… the 633 native communities in Canada be reduced to between 60 and 80. The 10 Algonquin reserves in Quebec and Ontario, for example, would become one.  Same for the Cree. The Mohawk. And so on”.   The guy didn’t consult  any of us or visit any of our communities.  Now, if he has any sense, he’d be afraid to come.  He wants to redirect the flow of nearly $10 billion in federal funding for “aboriginal” programs and services in Canada.  He thinks we wont need it because we are going to liquidated.  So he wants the money to go to the many “aboriginal” that he and Mother Jones have created.    …………………………NWMO wants to store nuclear waste in Indigenous communities in the Canadian Shield.  Sites in NAN (Nishnaabe Aski Nation) in northern Ontario appear to be the most likely. ………………………………A telling example of these “courtships” with the Indigenous is the recent attempted seduction of the Navaho.  Areva, the French nuclear power company, took the council on a recent trip to Paris.  Areva “owns” uranium mines in northern Saskatchewan.  They want the Navaho to put a nuclear reactor and to do more uranium mining in their territory in the U.S. southwest.

The Navaho know about the devastation of uranium tailings.  Most want nothing to do with nuclear development.  The same is true of the Ojibwe, Cree and Metis who have been targeted in northern Canada.  Nishnaabe are fully aware of and suffering from the ongoing poisoning at Blind River and the tons of nuclear waste at Elliot Lake.

Nuclear promoters like AECL (Atomic Energy Canada Ltd) and CNSC (Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission) will coo soothingly, in their brushed suits, carefully coiffed hair [if they have any] and manicured hands, “There’s no risk”…………………………

We all have to drastically cut back on our materialistic lifestyle.  Every household could be generating enough clean energy to power their own grid.  We Indigenous understand this basic and practical way of taking only what we need and leaving little or no footprint.

The elders are concerned about the future based on our traditional knowledge.  The youth are concerned with living with the legacy of nuclear waste disposal.  Women are concerned with protecting the clean and safe water for all people and the environment as this is our traditional role.

http://www.pacificfreepress.com/news/1/3738-green-glow-renaissance-global-nuclear-genocide.html

February 20, 2009 Posted by | Canada, indigenous issues | Leave a comment

Nuke site seeks world heritage status

Herald Sun February 20, 2009

BIKINI Atoll, the site of the United States’ largest hydrogen bomb test and the place that lends its name to the skimpy two-piece swimsuit, is seeking recognition as a world heritage site.

“Nuclear bomb tests at Bikini Atoll shaped the history of the people of Bikini, the history of the Marshall Islands and the history of the entire world,” according to the Bikini proposal released today.

The 86-page document, to be presented to UNESCO’s World Heritage program, has been drawn up by Bikini liaison official Jack Niedenthal and Australian-based consultant Nicole Baker. A world heritage nomination involves a multi-level review and a decision is unlikely to be made before June next year, Ms Baker said…………………………”There are only a few 20th century sites, few are in the Pacific and few have confronting values,” she said, referring to Bikini’s status as a nuclear test ground zero as “nuclear colonialism”.

http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,25081441-5012752,00.html

February 20, 2009 Posted by | OCEANIA, politics | Leave a comment

The Pebble Bed Modular Nuclear Reactor – a black hole for public funds

No Amount of Redesign Will Save the PBMR

Earthlife Africa Tristen Taylor
18th of Feb. 2009
nuclear-costs1

With the PBMR Company seeking to redesign the Pebble Bed Modular Reactor
(PBMR) to focus more on heat applications, it is imperative to note that
disadvantages of continuing with the PBMR remain.

The Pebble Bed Modular Reactor has become a black hole for public funds. The
costs involved in the PBMR saga are illustrative of the financial risks
inherent in nuclear power in general.

In 1999, the PMBR (165MW capacity) construction costs were budgeted at R2
billion. By 2005, these construction costs had risen by a factor of seven,
to R14 billion without a single PBMR being constructed. These costs do not
include the decommissioning costs, which will be considerable.

Based upon the 2008 Environmental Impact Assessment for the PBMR
Demonstration Reactor and the decommissioning costs for of the predecessor
to the PBMR-the German AVR-the costs to decommission a single PBMR range
from R1.5 billion to R70 billion. It is nearly impossible, due to the
lifespan of the reactor and the variable rates of contamination, to be more
exact than this. Hence, the decommissioning costs of the PBMR are uncertain
and could incur a heavy burden on future generations, absorbing funds for
vital social programmes.

An additional expense will be the waste storage costs, which are impossible
to calculate due to the long-term nature of storing waste; for example,
uranium-235 has a half-life of 704 million years, plutonium-239 a half-life
of 24,110 years, and caesium a half-life of 30.2 years. These kinds of
timeframes defy economic planning, and, given our pressing social needs,
should not be entertained.

The costs for the PBMR are not efficient in terms of power generation. For
example, Eskom is seeking finance of R5 billion to build a concentrated
solar plant (100MW) in the Northern Cape; R14 billion for 165MW or R5
billion for 100MW capacity, economic sense favours the solar plant. This
also excludes the costs associated with the security apparatus necessary for
the PMBR.

Nuclear materials and equipment need to be protected and highly regulated,
due to the threat of contamination and theft. The consequences of
radioactive material in the hands on malicious organisations could have
profoundly negative consequences and has to be avoided at all costs. While
currently unquantifiable at this stage, these security costs will be passed
onto the state and are unique to nuclear power. Other forms of energy
generation (including heat generation) do not require these increased
security costs.

No matter how much the PBMR Company and the Department of Minerals and
Energy seek to spin the matter, the PBMR has been a waste of vital public
funds and will continue to be so until abandoned.

February 20, 2009 Posted by | business and costs, South Africa | Leave a comment