Report: International Energy Agency Deliberately Undermined Growth Potential of Renewable Energy : Red, Green, and Blue
Report: International Energy Agency Deliberately Undermined Growth Potential of Renewable Energy : Red, Green, and Blue Mridul Chadha 11 Jan 09 A group of scientists and politicians has accused the International Energy Agency of publishing false data about the growth potential of the renewable energy in the future. The Energy Watch Group said that the IEA “consistently underestimated the amount of electricity generated by wind power while advising various governments.” The group holds IEA’s close ties to oil, gas and nuclear sectors responsible for the its “ignorance and contempt” towards renewable energy.
The International Energy Agency is an intergovernmental organization which publishes reports about future trends of energy generation and use which help governments across the world to chalk out energy production plans. The Energy Watch group says that the IEA reports glorify fossil fuels deeming them irreplaceable by renewable energy
sources.
The group compared the production projections of wind energy that the IEA presented in the past
decade to the the actual growth in wind energy generation.
In 1998, the IEA predicted that global wind electricity generation would total 47.4GW by 2020. This figure was reached in December 2004. In 2002, the IEA revised its estimate to 104GW wind by 2020 – a capacity that had been exceeded by last summer.
In 2007, net additions of wind power across the world were more than four-fold the average IEA estimate from its 1995-2004 predictions.
The IEA report predicts a five-fold increase in wind energy from 2006-2015 but then assumes an abrupt & unexplained downturn in production. A Swiss parliament member also notes that IEA derives most of its employees from the oil industry and raised questions about its intent regarding the energy outlook reports.
One has to question the wind energy growth numbers that IEA puts in its reports. Investments in renewable energy have grown tremendously around the world. The European Union has been very open about its huge investment plans in renewable energy keeping with the emissions reduction targets and the clean energy targets it has set for 2010 and 2020. China has become the largest investor in clean energy, pumping in billions of dollars in building some of the biggest wind and solar energy plants in the world.
Tags: nuclear, antinuclear, uranium, radioactive, renewables
Obama’s worst fear: Hijacked nukes
Obama’s worst fear: Hijacked nukes
THE TIMES OF INDIA 12 Jan 2009, David E Sanger, NYT News Service “……………………………….. Just last month in Washington, members of the federally appointed bipartisan Commission on the Prevention of Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation and Terrorism made it clear that for sheer scariness, nothing could compete with what they had heard in a series of high-level intelligence briefings about the dangers of Pakistan’s nuclear technology going awry. “When you map WMD and terrorism, all roads intersect in Pakistan,” said Graham Allison, a Harvard professor and a leading nuclear expert on the commission. “The nuclear security of the arsenal is now a lot better than it was. But the unknown variable here is the future of Pakistan itself, because it’s not hard to envision a situation in which the state’s authority falls apart and you’re not sure who’s in control of the weapons, the nuclear labs, the materials.” ……………………………. What Obama now inherits in Pakistan is a fully dysfunctional relationship between that country and the US. Last summer, Bush signed secret orders allowing American special forces to run ground raids into Pakistani territory to root out not only al-Qaida but also a list of other militants who could be targeted by either the CIA or American military. At the end of Bush’s term, his aides handed over to Obama’s transition team a lengthy review of policy in Afghanistan and Pakistan, concluding that in the end, the US has far more at stake in preventing Pakistan’s collapse than it does in stabilizing Afghanistan or Iraq.
Obama’s worst fear: Hijacked nukes-US-World-The Times of India
Tags: nuclear, antinuclear, uranium, radioactive
Nuclear fears as danger plant is reopened in gas war with Russia
THE TIMES OF INDIA January 12, 2009 Nuclear fears as danger plant is reopened in gas war with Russia
Fears were raised yesterday over a decision to restart a potentially dangerous decommissioned nuclear power plant in the centre of Europe because of a shortage of gas caused by Russia’s dispute with Ukraine.
Slovakia, defying undertakings given when it joined the European Union, said that it would reactivate a Soviet-style nuclear generator that has a record of safety problems because it had received no Russian gas since last Thursday………………………………….
Michael Spindelegger, Austria’s Foreign Minister, said that the danger of the Soviet-era reactors “must not be underestimated” and called for an investigation to determine whether Slovakia was really in a state of emergency.
The head of the Austrian Green Party, Eva Glawischnig, said: “The reactor is considered one of the three most dangerous nuclear facilities in Europe. To reactivate it means to put people in danger, and not only in neighbouring Austria.”
Nuclear fears as danger plant is reopened in gas war with Russia – Times Online
Tags: nuclear, antinuclear, uranium, radioactive
Nuclear veterans told: No case for compensation
Nuclear veterans told: No case for compensation
Ministers tell servicemen who witnessed 1950s test explosions they should have claimed years ago THE INDEPENDENT By Robert Verkaik, Law Editor 11 January 2009
Ministers have been accused of blocking compensation claims brought by hundreds of nuclear test veterans who believe they developed cancers and other illnesses after being forced to witness atomic bomb experiments in the 1950s and ’60s.
Despite pay-outs to former servicemen in the US, France and China, Britain has told its veterans there is no case for offering compensation, and that there is no scientific justification for a full investigation into birth defects suffered by the veterans’ children and grandchildren……………….This refusal fully to investigate the human legacy of Britain’s nuclear weapons test programme has come as a blow to the airmen, soldiers and sailors who stood on Pacific island beaches in the late 1950s watching nuclear explosions while wearing little more than shorts and sandals.
Nuclear veterans told: No case for compensation – Home News, UK – The Independent
Tags: nuclear, antinuclear, uranium, radioactive
The Punch: Time to stop this nuclear nonsense
Time to stop this nuclear nonsense
function submitCCCForm(){ PopUp = window.open(”, ‘_Icon’,’location=no,toolbar=no,status=no,width=650,height=550,scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes’); this.document.cccform.submit(); }Import-dependent economies are certain to face the problems imported goods caused in their countries of origin. This paradigm is the prism through which I see the recent argument in some quarters that nuclear power plants are the solution to this country’s electricity crisis. This specious agenda, which died shortly after its birth during the Murtala-Obasanjo regime, but resurrected during the Obasanjo administration, is now gaining ground in the Yar‘Adua years.
However, someone needs to tell our rulers that building a nuclear power plant isn‘t the same as buying Made-in-China satellites. It is trite logic that a country that has problems keeping militants away from its pipelines; burglars and arsonists away from its government offices; and armed robbers away from governors’ convoys would certainly have problems keeping terrorists away from its nuclear reactors.
While working on a story on Nigeria’s nuclear agenda three years ago, the only place where I found a measure of support for the project was a government agency. The consensus among all the other scientists and civil society activists that I interviewed was that Nigeria, given her insecurity, porous borders, poor disaster management record and a sundry of other ills, had no business with nuclear plants.
The Punch: Time to stop this nuclear nonsense
Tags: nuclear, antinuclear, uranium, radioactive
Matheson poised to reintroduce foreign waste ban
Matheson poised to reintroduce foreign waste ban
EnergySolutions » Company ‘fully expected’ return of bill.Judy FahysThe Salt Lake Tribune 01/10/2009 MSTU.S. Rep. Jim Matheson and a bipartisan group of members of Congress are reviving their bill to stop imports of foreign nuclear waste to the United States.Reps. Bart Gordon, D-Tenn., and Lee Terry, R-Neb., have called a news conference for next week with the Utah Democrat to reintroduce the measure, now dubbed the Radioactive Import Deterrence Act of 2009, or the “RID Act.”
The bill would slam the door shut on most foreign-generated radioactive waste seeking disposal in U.S. landfills, including the low-level radioactive waste site owned and operated by Salt Lake City-based EnergySolutions Inc. in Tooele County.
“Utah is not the place for the world’s radioactive junk,” said Matheson……………………………… Several thousand people objected to the EnergySolutions Italian waste import request during a public comment period.
Matheson poised to reintroduce foreign waste ban – Salt Lake Tribune
Tags: nuclear, antinuclear, uranium, radioactive
Cheap nuclear power is faulty accounting
Cheap nuclear power is faulty accounting
Alberta Lea Tribune John E. Gibson, January 10, 2009Your utility bills have carried a surcharge of $27 billion for nuclear power. The Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 required nuclear power providers to contribute to the Nuclear Waste Fund, which funds were to build a Nuclear Waste Repository by 1998. This repository is yet to open, leaving our government open to lawsuits. Our government has spend $94 million defending itself against breach of contract resulting in a $420 million judgment for the plaintiffs.Outstanding liabilities are in the billions. Should the repository at Yucca Mountain become operational it could hold existing and future wastes from the nukes already built. Yucca Mountain could not hold the wastes from an expanded nuclear power industry. Wait! That’s not all folks!
A railroad connection must be built to transport the wastes to the repository. Who will pay for that? How will the wastes be secured in transit? Who will pay for that?
What must we conclude? The argument for building more nukes is based on large increases in electricity consumption, which are suspect. “Cheap Nuclear Energy” is a product of faulty accounting……………………………….
Albert Lea Tribune | Cheap nuclear power is faulty accounting
Tags: nuclear, antinuclear, uranium, radioactive
Nuclear dump: Cornwall cannot be bought, say MPs
Nuclear dump: Cornwall cannot be bought, say MPs
this is cornwall.co.uk January 09, 2009, Cornwall’s Liberal Democrat MPs and Parliamentary candidates have united to slam plans to investigate the possibility of a nuclear waste site being located in the Duchy…………………………If the county were to host such a site it could receive billions of pounds of Government funds in return to improve infrastructure and public facilities…………………………other Lib Dems say that no amount of money would be enough to convince them it would be a good idea.
Stephen Gilbert, parliamentary candidate for St Austell and Newquay, said: “My view is very simple, the Government could never offer Cornwall enough money for me to believe that we should be used as the dumping ground for Britain’s nuclear waste. The County Council Lib Dem Executive was right to reject the idea in the first place and now needs to throw it out again.
“Cornwall has fought long and hard to develop its reputation as being at the forefront of the green revolution, with great local food producers, new technologies and a growing environmental tourism sector. We must not put this reputation at risk.”
North Cornwall MP Dan Rogerson said: “We will not accept the Government’s bribes.
“Cornwall should not have to become a dumping ground for hazardous nuclear waste just to get the funding we need for local services. We deserve that as of right.
“There may be extra funding on offer from Ministers but the price is too high, and I am pleased the leadership of the council is clear that this should not go ahead.”
Falmouth and Camborne MP Julia Goldsworthy added: “The last thing Cornwall needs is nuclear waste on our doorstep.
“There could be serious risks to health if anything went wrong with the storage arrangements, to say nothing of the obvious problems that could occur if material escaped en route through Cornwall.
“This is a bad idea that the council was right to abandon. They must stick to their guns.”
Nuclear dump: Cornwall cannot be bought, say MPs
Tags: nuclear, antinuclear, uranium, radioactive
-
Archives
- December 2025 (286)
- November 2025 (359)
- October 2025 (377)
- September 2025 (258)
- August 2025 (319)
- July 2025 (230)
- June 2025 (348)
- May 2025 (261)
- April 2025 (305)
- March 2025 (319)
- February 2025 (234)
- January 2025 (250)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- Atrocities
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Events
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- Weekly Newsletter
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS


