Keep to emission cuts, say economists
Keep to emission cuts, say economists
The Age Ari Sharp
January 3, 2009
ECONOMISTS have given a lukewarm response to Kevin Rudd’s carbon emission reduction targets, but have urged the Federal Government not to be spooked by the global economic downturn.
Last month, the Government revealed it would be seeking to reduce carbon emissions by 5 per cent on 2000 levels by 2020 unless an international agreement on carbon trading could be reached. In that case, the reduction target rises to 15 per cent. The 2050 target is a 60 per cent reduction.
“There’s never going to be a good time to introduce this, so the current crisis should not be used as an excuse to delay,” said Chris Caton from BT Financial Group. So far, the timing of the carbon pollution reduction scheme (CPRS) does not appear to have been affected, with the Government committed to a 2010 start date.
University of Queensland academic John Quiggin argued that the pursuit of environmental policies could in fact bolster the economic recovery. “Use green jobs programs as a focus of expansionary policy,” he said………………………….Monash University academic Jakob Madsen said steep price increases on carbon were needed to encourage the development of alternative fuel sources. “In Denmark, 40 per cent of the energy will come from renewable resources by 2020. Australia should easily be able to meet that target.”………………………..
The Scandinavian social democracy will be in the spotlight in December when world leaders gather in Copenhagen in an attempt to nut out a global agreement on emission reductions beyond 2012.
“The world is watching Australia and we can use this opportunity to help broker an international agreement,” said Austrade’s Tim Harcourt.
No comments yet.
-
Archives
- December 2025 (301)
- November 2025 (359)
- October 2025 (377)
- September 2025 (258)
- August 2025 (319)
- July 2025 (230)
- June 2025 (348)
- May 2025 (261)
- April 2025 (305)
- March 2025 (319)
- February 2025 (234)
- January 2025 (250)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- Atrocities
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Events
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- Weekly Newsletter
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS


Leave a comment