The nuclear sword of Damocles – On Line Opinion – 20/10/2008
The nuclear sword of Damocles
The Forum By Evaggelos Vallianatos, 20/10/2008 – “……………………………..the sword of Damocles, now armed with nuclear bombs, is ever ready to slice through the earth. Since August 6, 1945, the people of the world have had to live in the shadow of death.This new immoral condition is the outcome of the logic of total war and the religion of science, which grew around nuclear physics. That the global nuclear terror has survived for 63 years is partly a testimony to the hubris of the teachers of physics and engineering who, corrupted by the military, accepted bomb making as science.Such transformation of physics from the study of nature to the training of engineers to think and construct bombs and factories of nuclear electricity has had tragic consequences, the extreme example of which is evolving in Pakistan, India, Iran and North Korea possessing or making their own nuclear weapons.
Many Pakistanis and Indians can barely afford one meal a day, yet their countries are armed to the teeth with the ultimate bomb. Iran, governed by Islamic priests, is determined to acquire the bomb. And Communist North Korea is telling the world that now that it has its own atomic or nuclear bomb no one will dare ignore it any more.
To avoid a global nuclear meltdown, we must abolish all that has to do with the smashing of the atom – nuclear weapons and factories of nuclear electricity – or these technologies will abolish us. In large numbers, nuclear bombs are possibly geocidal. But even one is genocidal……………………..We should know the nuclear bomb is neither a battlefield weapon nor an object of worship. Using this technology for electricity is a dangerous delusion. Nuclear power plants never cease poisoning people and nature. The wastes of these factories will be hazardous for hundreds and thousands of years.
The nuclear sword of Damocles – On Line Opinion – 20/10/2008
Tags: nuclear, antinuclear, radioactive, uranium
Nuclear disarmament push a ‘difficult job’ for Rudd – ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)
Nuclear disarmament push a ‘difficult job’ for Rudd
ABC News Prime Minister Kevin Rudd will have difficulty leading the nuclear disarmament debate because of the nation’s expanding uranium industry, the Greens said.
Mr Rudd’s foreign policy initiative – the International Commission on Nuclear Non-proliferation and Disarmament – will hold its first meeting in Sydney next week.
Mr Rudd last month said the commission has a two-year mandate to reinvigorate the global debate on preventing the spread of nuclear weapons and for nuclear disarmament…………………
Greens Senator Scott Ludlum said while the commission was a welcome step, Australia’s role was compromised by its expanding uranium export industry.
“The key thing really is that it’s at risk already of being sabotaged by the nuclear power industry and the uranium mining industry,” he said.
“So the Prime Minister’s got a bit of a difficult job ahead of him walking that line.
“It’s going to be very difficult for Australia as one of the world’s largest uranium suppliers with a very powerful mining lobby to be an honest broker in this case.”…………………..
“This commission’s not going to be successful unless we are able to wind back the civil nuclear power industry because every nuclear power station essentially is just a plutonium factory hooked up to a steam turbine,” he said.
“We can’t have radical expansion of nuclear power capacity without making it dramatically more difficult to prevent weapons from spreading.”
Nuclear disarmament push a ‘difficult job’ for Rudd – ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)
Tags: nuclear, antinuclear, radioactive, uranium
Nuclear nonsense :: CHICAGO SUN-TIMES :: Neil Steinberg
Nuclear nonsense
McCain’s vow to build 45 atomic plants has bold glow of deceptionCHICAGO SUN TIMES October 19, 2008
Opening shotThe most recent nuclear power plant to go online in the United States was the Watts Bar station in Tennessee, which started producing power in 1996, a scant 23 years after construction began. Thus John McCain’s debate claim that, as president, he would somehow push through the construction of 45, count ’em, 45 new nuclear plants without worrying about where they’d be placed or what we’d do with the radioactive waste drew quite a response,…………….. pal who works at the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, and I asked him what he thinks of McCain’s plan.
“No way,” he said. “He’s crazy. We’ll be lucky to build two nuclear plants in the next 10 years, and that’ll cost $18 billion.”
I’m all for boldness. But claiming you’ll solve our energy problems by spending money we don’t have on nuclear plants that won’t be built, well, that isn’t bold, it’s deceptive.
Nuclear nonsense :: CHICAGO SUN-TIMES :: Neil Steinberg
Tags: nuclear, antinuclear, radioactive, uranium
New Energy Focus – Warm welcome for small-scale renewable energy feed-in tariff
Warm welcome for small-scale renewable energy feed-in tariff
New Energy focus 17-10-08 The renewable energy industry has welcomed energy secretary Ed Miliband’s announcement yesterday that the government will introduce feed-in tariffs to support small-scale green power projects. Mr Miliband revealed in his debut speech to Parliament yesterday that the government will add an amendment to the Energy Bill to introduce feed-in tariffsFeed-in tariffs are effectively long-term contracts that will offer the generators of renewable energy a guaranteed price for their power above the general market rate for electricity.
The government is still backing its Renewable Obligation system for large-scale renewable power projects, particularly since the system will provide more certainty of the UK meeting its renewable energy targets than a feed-in tariff on a large scale.
But the feed-in tariff on a small scale should mean microgenerators and on-site power projects will have a guaranteed premium rate income for their power, providing certainty needed for investment decisions.
New Energy Focus – Warm welcome for small-scale renewable energy feed-in tariff
Tags: nuclear, antinuclear, radioactive, uranium
-
Archives
- December 2025 (301)
- November 2025 (359)
- October 2025 (377)
- September 2025 (258)
- August 2025 (319)
- July 2025 (230)
- June 2025 (348)
- May 2025 (261)
- April 2025 (305)
- March 2025 (319)
- February 2025 (234)
- January 2025 (250)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- culture and arts
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- PERSONAL STORIES
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- Women
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- Atrocities
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- culture and arts
- Events
- Fuk 2022
- Fuk 2023
- Fukushima 2017
- Fukushima 2018
- fukushima 2019
- Fukushima 2020
- Fukushima 2021
- general
- global warming
- Humour (God we need it)
- Nuclear
- RARE EARTHS
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
- Weekly Newsletter
- World
- World Nuclear
- YouTube
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS

