nuclear-news

The News That Matters about the Nuclear Industry Fukushima Chernobyl Mayak Three Mile Island Atomic Testing Radiation Isotope

Radiation exposure to workers in China

radiation-warningAging facilities, human error add radiation risk
By Chen Jia (China Daily)Updated: 2009-08-04

China is facing a growing problem with more and more accidents in the workplace involving radiation exposure, experts have said.

……………………….. most of them are due to human error,” said Wang Zuoyuan, former chief of the radiation protection and safety department under the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. He was speaking to China Economic Weekly in an article published yesterday.

Transportation errors, equipment failure and radiation sources that were stolen or abandoned were among the main causes of the accidents, Wang said.

The number of radiation sources in the country reached 106,000 at the end of 2008, according to the Ministry of Environmental Protection………………

People can get cancer when exposed to certain types of radiation, said Liu Ying, who works for the Chinese Center for Medical Response to Radiation Emergency under the National Institute for Radiological Protection.

August 4, 2009 Posted by | China, environment | , , , | Leave a comment

Truckers exposed to high dose of radiation

(Canada) Truckers exposed to high dose of radiation during cross-country haul: report
Google News
By Steve Rennie (CP) – 4 August 09 OTTAWA
— Two truckers were exposed to excessive doses of radiation last year while hauling a radioactive device across the country, newly released documents show.

A preliminary investigation by Canada’s nuclear-safety watchdog found the drivers got more than their yearly limit of radiation on a six-day trip last December.The Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission learned of the problem when the shipment triggered a radiation alarm on arrival at an MDS Nordion office in Ottawa.

The Canadian Press: Truckers exposed to high dose of radiation during cross-country haul: report

August 4, 2009 Posted by | Canada, safety | , , , | Leave a comment

Nuclear plant rapped over safety

Nuclear plant rapped over safety
The Local
3 Aug 09
The Forsmark nuclear plant, 130 kilometres north of Stockholm, received the criticism in an inspection report from the Swedish Radiation Safety Authority (SSM), local media say.

The plant is criticised for not following up on the results of safety work and for not having routines governing how safety inspections should be carried out. The report also says that there is no clear description of the responsibilities of those who investigate incidents at the Forsmark.

The power station’s owners, Forsmarks Kraftfrupp AB, has been given until the end of the year to resolve the problems.

Forsmark has previously been the subject of safety concerns. It was criticised last year by SSM after it was revealed that an emergency cooling system vent had been shut for a year. Inspectors said the incident cast doubts about the safety culture at the plant.

The Forsmark nuclear plant, 130 kilometres north of Stockholm, received the criticism in an inspection report from the Swedish Radiation Safety Authority (SSM),

Nuclear plant rapped over safety – The Local

August 4, 2009 Posted by | 1, EUROPE, safety | , , , | Leave a comment

Stop Making More Nuclear Waste

Stop Making More Nuclear Waste
Care2 petition site August 09

Target:
1000 000 000

Sponsored by: 

“Uranium is the raw material of a power-elite who has taken Mother Earth’s every living creature hostage.”  The Late Petra Kelly, An Authentic Green
Nuclear fissioning happens in nuclear reactors or in nuclear warheads.
Nuclear waste is the only product of nuclear fissioning.
Nuclear waste is destructive of all living things.
Nuclear waste lasts forever and must also be monitored forever.
Nuclear waste will beggar our grand children.
Greed for profit now is the only thing that drives the nuclear industry.
Tapping renewable energy sources coupled with moderate consumption

Stop Making More Nuclear Waste – The Petition Site

August 4, 2009 Posted by | 1 | Leave a comment

Is Nuclear Power Renewable?

Is Nuclear Power Renewable?
The New York Times August 3, 2009,  By James Kanter
“………………..the nuclear industry and pro-nuclear officials from countries including France have been trying to brand the technology as renewable, on the grounds that it produces little or no greenhouse gases. Branding nuclear as renewable could also enable nuclear operators to benefit from some of the same subsidies and friendly policies offered to clean energies like wind, solar and biomass.

So far, however, efforts to categorize nuclear as a renewable source of power are making little headway.

The latest setback came last week, when the head of the International Renewable Energy Agency –- an intergovernmental group known as IRENA that advises about 140 member countries on making the transition to clean energy –- dismissed the notion of including nuclear power among its favored technologies.

“IRENA will not support nuclear energy programs because it’s a long, complicated process, it produces waste and is relatively risky,” Hélène Pelosse, its interim director general, told Reuters last week.

Energy sources like solar power, Ms. Pelosse said, are better alternatives — and less expensive ones, “especially with countries blessed with so much sun for solar plants,” she said.

Energy and Green Business – Green Inc. Blog – NYTimes.com

August 4, 2009 Posted by | 1 | Leave a comment

Surviving Chernobyl

Surviving Chernobyl
HAARETZ.com By Lily Galili 3 August 09
For 1,200 people living in Israel, the concept of a nuclear threat is not an abstract idea. They were there – inside the Chernobyl nuclear reactor – immediately after the April 1986 explosion. They can confirm that while you can’t smell radiation, you can taste it. Even today, after having made a new life in Israel, the metallic taste remains in their mouths, which, in many cases, are toothless.

Their teeth fell out in Chernobyl, while other serious problems began developing during the months they spent trying to “neutralize” the nuclear power plant, although they were unprepared and defenseless. They were called liquidators, a term embracing a variety of professionals – engineers, electricians, physicians and nurses – sent to neutralize the seething nuclear reactor. ……………..
……….what really worries them is not lifespan, but quality of life. They suffer from various ailments – damaged thyroid glands, eaten-away livers, twisted bones – and they are all afraid. Some of them decided not to have children after taking into consideration the genetic implications of what they had undergone.

…………..“I oppose nuclear armament and war with Iran,” Kalantirsky says angrily. “All those who underwent the Chernobyl experience think like me.”

……….Around 19,000 people exposed to radiation in childhood are registered in SPECTR’s database, and another 6,000 have been born to parents from radiation-contaminated areas. “There are problems in this group,” notes Shapiro, “but not exceptional ones.” Today he is mainly worried about the third generation: the children of those exposed to radiation as children. “Although we do not have figures yet, we are still concerned,” he says. “The genetic results appear only in the third generation.”

According to research conducted by SPECTR, the morbidity rate for hereditary diseases will continue to grow. The more disturbing news, Shapiro says, is that radiation-induced cancer will peak 50 years after Chernobyl.

Surviving Chernobyl – Haaretz – Israel News

August 3, 2009 Posted by | 1 | Leave a comment

Plan to Pay Sick Nuclear Workers Unfairly Rejects Many, Doctor Says

Plan to pay sick nuclear workers unfairly rejects many, Doctor says
THE HUFFINGTON POST by Laura Frnk 3 August 09
Carla McCabe spent a decade building nuclear bombs at the sprawling Rocky Flats complex near Denver. When she developed a brain tumor and asked for help, federal officials told her that none of the toxic substances used at the top-secret bomb factory could have caused her cancer.Now, on the eighth anniversary of the federal program created to help sick nuclear weapons workers, the man who until recently was the program’s top doctor says that McCabe, now 55, and many others like her are being improperly rejected……

…..”I was muzzled,” said Schwartz, a Harvard-trained doctor with a master’s degree in nuclear engineering, whose job was overseeing medical decisions at the federal compensation program……..

………..sick workers, who have banded together in multiple advocacy groups across the nation, point out that the Labor Department has denied nearly three out of four claims — 127,000 filed on behalf of sick nuclear weapons workers or their survivors in the past eight years.

The sick workers and their advocates say they feel vindicated that Schwartz confirms many of the complaints they’ve raised previously about waste, bias and bad science within the program.

Plan to Pay Sick Nuclear Workers Unfairly Rejects Many, Doctor Says

August 3, 2009 Posted by | 1 | Leave a comment

Soviet-Era Uranium Waste Sites Now Threaten Central Asia

Soviet-Era Uranium Waste Sites Now Threaten Central Asia
 mskFerghana.Ru  2 August 09 translated by Paul Goble

Storage sites for uranium tailings that were built in Soviet times in Tajikistan are now leaking radiation into the surrounding atmosphere and ground water supplies, undermining the health and well-being of the people of a republic and a broader region that lack the resources to clean up a problem that it did nothing to create.

At three formerly “closed” locations in Tajikistan – Taboshar, Chkalovsk and Adrasman – Soviet state enterprises mined uranium and left enormous piles of radioactive tailings……………

They are located near major bodies of water: the Kayrakkum reservoir and the Syrdarya River which flows through the territory not only of Tajikistan but of Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan and Kazakhstan as well. As a result, what many might dismiss as Tajikistan’s problem is a much larger one.

Scholars have determined that the radiation from these tailings in some places is more than 30 times levels that threaten human health. But the problems these tailings pose is not limited to radiation directly. They also are the source of poisonous chemicals which have leached into the ground and now appear in plants, animals, and drinking water.

The impact of the release of radioactive materials on the health of the population is already clear. Not only are the numbers of people suffering from cancer increasing, but the age of onset of cancers is falling, with many local people showing signs of cancer when they are only 15 or 16 years old, something almost unheard of earlier……………………

the amount of radioactive leavings is enormous, more than 450 million tons.

As a result the prospects are not good. “The elites have left the area forever because they know that the supplies of uranium are practically exhausted and that sooner or later all the factories and combines involved with the production of nuclear fuel will stop.”

In the end, the news service suggests, the local population will stand alone, facing “only the ruins of nuclear processing and mountains of ecological problems.”

Soviet-Era Uranium Waste Sites Now Threaten Central Asia – Ferghana.Ru Information agency, Moscow

August 3, 2009 Posted by | 1 | Leave a comment

nuclear reactors not needed for Medical Isotopes

radiation-warningRace on in the Prairies to solve isotope shortage
Acsion Industries, University of Winnipeg say their cheap solution could be running in three years
The Globe and Mail 1 August 09
“…………………the smaller operation could be up and running inside three years, with little regulatory hassle, and for the bargain-basement price of $35-million……………………………I don’t think you’ll find another expression of interest that combines so clearly a health-care focus and a low cost. We’ll have to be taken seriously.”…………………..
the University of Winnipeg submission offers something completely different.

Under the proposal, researchers would shore up the country’s isotope stocks using a Manitoba-based particle accelerator rather than a nuclear reactor.

Unlike a reactor, a particle accelerator does not produce nuclear waste and would not be subject to the same stringent rules that make reactor construction a decade-long process.

“It’s a completely different technology,” said Jeff Martin, a University of Winnipeg physicist. “The regulatory process is much simpler, and for good reason. For instance, you can shut an accelerator off. With a reactor, that’s tricky.”

To carry out the proposal, the university has launched the Prairie Isotope Production Enterprise (PIPE), a not-for-profit partnership that includes Acsion, the province, the Winnipeg Regional Health Authority and other nuclear and radioisotope companies……………………..

While the Manitoba solution isn’t intended to solve international supply issues, the technology could be exported.

“Once you get it working here,” said Randy Kobes, associate dean of science at the university, “you can franchise it.”

Race on in the Prairies to solve isotope shortage – The Globe and Mail

August 1, 2009 Posted by | Canada, environment | , , , , | Leave a comment

Financial costs of U.S. nuclear weapons

The Costs of U.S. Nuclear Weapons
mil.news.sohu.com 29 July 09 “..
……….This issue brief, based on the 1998 book Atomic Audit: The Costs and Consequences of U.S. Nuclear Weapons Since 1940, examines how and why key decisions were made, what factors influenced those decisions, and whether alternatives were considered.  In so doing, it helps explain the process by which an arsenal consisting of just two primitive weapons in 1945 eventually grew to more than 32,000 highly sophisticated ones, what this process cost, and how the costs and consequences of the program were understood by policymakers at the time.

……………….The amount spent through 1996—$5.5 trillion—was 29 percent of all military spending from 1940 through 1996 ($18.7 trillion). This figure is significantly larger than any previous official or unofficial estimate of nuclear weapons expenditures, exceeding all other categories of government spending except non-nuclear national defense ($13.2 trillion) and social security ($7.9 trillion)…………………During this period, the United States spent on average nearly $98 billion a year developing and maintaining its nuclear arsenal.
It is very difficult to comprehend figures of this magnitude. To provide some perspective, consider the following:

$5.8 trillion divided equally among everyone living in the United States equals a bit more than $21,000 per person.

$5.8 trillion in one dollar bills stacked one atop another would stretch 459,361 miles (739,117 kilometers), to the Moon and nearly back…………….

The Costs of U.S. Nuclear Weapons-搜狐军事频道

August 1, 2009 Posted by | weapons and war | , , , | Leave a comment

Braidwood nuclear reactor shut down

Braidwood nuclear reactor shut down
Chicago Breaking News 31 july 09
One of the two nuclear reactors at the Braidwood Generating Station was shut down last night and remains offline this morning because of a transformer problem that is preventing the unit from receiving power, an Exelon spokeswoman said………..
The transformer problem triggered an automatic shutdown at the facility 60 miles southwest of Chicago

Braidwood nuclear reactor shut down – Chicago Breaking News

August 1, 2009 Posted by | 1, safety, USA | , , | Leave a comment

Revealed: Burma’s nuclear bombshell

Revealed: Burma’s nuclear bombshell
Sydney Morning Herald Hamish McDonald Asia-Pacific Editor August 1, 2009

BURMA’s isolated military junta is building a secret nuclear reactor and plutonium extraction facilities with North Korean help, with the aim of acquiring its first nuclear bomb in five years, according to evidence from key defectors revealed in an exclusive Herald report today.

The secret complex, much of it in caves tunnelled into a mountain at Naung Laing in northern Burma, runs parallel to a civilian reactor being built at another site by Russia that both the Russians and Burmese say will be put under international safeguards……………………………..

Washington is increasingly concerned that Burma is the main nuclear proliferation threat from North Korea, after Israel destroyed in September 2007 a reactor the North Koreans were apparently building in Syria.

Revealed: Burma’s nuclear bombshell

August 1, 2009 Posted by | 1, ASIA, weapons and war | , , | Leave a comment

The Health Costs of U.S. Nuclear Weapons

The Costs of U.S. Nuclear Weapons
mil.news.sohu.com 29 July 09

……………….Environmental and Health Costs
“…………..one great irony of the Cold War is that although the United States produced nuclear weapons en masse to destroy the Soviet Union, and vice-versa, the principal victims of each country’s nuclear weapons were its own citizens.

From the very beginning, nuclear officials dealt with the problem of nuclear waste by devising interim rather than long-term solutions…………………..
………millions of gallons of wastes leaked into the ground. Hanford officials insisted for years that it would take centuries for the waste to reach the groundwater underneath the site. In fact, it was only a matter of decades before their optimistic assumptions were proven wrong.
“…………………..A major reason why the United States today faces a “cleanup” bill of at least $300 billion is that problems such as the Hanford waste tanks were ignored in favor of maintaining or increasing production of nuclear weapons. Production was the first priority of the government. Making sure it was done in a manner that did not unnecessarily hurt people or destroy the environment was a distant second. Had the government thought through more carefully the consequences of unrestrained production of plutonium and highly-enriched uranium, many of the problems—and bills—we face today could have been avoided or substantially mitigated. It now appears that in a number of cases, no effective “cleanup” will be possible and highly-contaminated sites will simply have to be fenced off and monitored for generations………….

…A number of the 600,000 people who worked in a nuclear weapons facility were exposed to unnecessarily high levels of radiation. Exposure to toxic chemicals was also high. At several facilities, no consistent records were kept of employee radiation exposures. At at least one, plant officials entered false readings into dosimetry logs. When workers fell ill and applied for worker’s compensation, the DOE spent millions of dollars on lawyer’s fees to avoid paying out even a single claim, out of fear that paying one claim would open the floodgates to lawsuits and increase calls for stricter health and safety measures, which would necessarily drive up costs and impede production of more weapons………………

……..Uranium miners, many of whom were Navajo, developed lung cancer after working in unvented mines without respirators or any sort of protective gear. Government officials were well aware of the dangers to the workers, but chose to ignore them to keep production high and the price of uranium low.

The Costs of U.S. Nuclear Weapons-搜狐军事频道

August 1, 2009 Posted by | 1, environment, USA | , , , , , | Leave a comment

Extreme secrecy on U.S. Nuclear Weapons impedes democracy

The Costs of U.S. Nuclear Weapons

mil.news.sohu.com 29 July 09
“……………………The extreme secrecy surrounding almost everything concerning nuclear weapons impeded effective democratic debate for decades. During the earliest years of the program, the AEC simply presented a budget to Congress with little or no detailed justification for how the money would be spent and why. The fundamental issue of how U.S. nuclear weapons would be used and how the requirements for deterrence were developed was never adequately explored during the early years when the basic framework for the program was being established. One result of this is that U.S. officials systematically failed to anticipate how the Soviet Union would perceive the U.S. buildup and how it would drive the Soviets to respond with its own provocative programs.  Finally, pork barrel politics (the use of government programs by elected representatives to enrich their constituents) was an important underlying factor as well…………………

………..Funding something connected to the defense of the nation required less justification and was more immune to careful scrutiny than a non-military program. Nuclear weapons programs became an important means of support for the otherwise poor and mostly rural communities where production facilities were located. In time, these communities became dependent, to varying degrees, on their local nuclear facilities, to the extent that local officials (and many workers) often downplayed the health and environmental risks they posed……………..

………..As a result of the Cold War and the imperatives of the nuclear standoff, this aspect of the American economy resembled the economy of the Soviet Union, in which decisions were made on a planned basis by a remote government, without reference to market forces, behind closed doors, for reasons that would not be made public

The Costs of U.S. Nuclear Weapons-搜狐军事频道

August 1, 2009 Posted by | 1, secrets,lies and civil liberties, USA | , , , | Leave a comment

US Lawmakers Concerned about ‘Reset’ of US-Russia Relations

US Lawmakers Concerned about ‘Reset’ of US-Russia Relations
Voice of America
By Dan RobinsonCapitol Hill31 July 2009
“………………Questions about where the U.S.-Russia relationship is going are many, ranging from arms control, missile defense and nonproliferation and Iran’s nuclear program, to cooperation in counter-terrorism and U.S. concerns about human rights and media freedom in Russia.

Among questions: How can the U.S. work with Russia to persuade Iran to end its uranium enrichment program?……………………………
Assistant Secretary Gordon told lawmakers that the Obama administration has told Russia that sales of sophisticated arms, including an anti-aircraft system, to Iran would be a real problem in bilateral ties.

On Iran’s nuclear program, Gordon noted that Russia has agreed to a joint threat assessment on ballistic and nuclear issues to include an examination of Iranian efforts.

He said one of the objectives of a U.S government inter-agency team visiting Moscow is to share the U.S. analysis, and persuade Russia that pressure must be increased if Iran fails to respond positively and soon on the issue.

VOA News – US Lawmakers Concerned about ‘Reset’ of US-Russia Relations

August 1, 2009 Posted by | 1, politics, USA | , , , | Leave a comment