<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>nuclear-news</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nuclear-news.net/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nuclear-news.net</link>
	<description>latest news on the uranium/nuclear industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 00:33:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='nuclear-news.net' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://nuclear-news.net/osd.xml" title="nuclear-news" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://nuclear-news.net/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Wrap up of the week&#8217;s nuclear news</title>
		<link>http://nuclear-news.net/2012/05/18/wrap-up-of-the-weeks-nuclear-news-8/</link>
		<comments>http://nuclear-news.net/2012/05/18/wrap-up-of-the-weeks-nuclear-news-8/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 09:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christina MacPherson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Christina&#039;s notes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nuclear-news.net/?p=24316</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Low level radiation research  Studies of the Mortality of Atomic Bomb Survivors, Report 14 finds that the linear theory of radiation holds good, –  as low doses increase, cancer risk increases. Japan The Oi municipal assembly passed a new resolution Monday to restart Unit 3 and 4 reactors. Anti nuclear activists determined to continue their struggle. Japan [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=nuclear-news.net&#038;blog=4114830&#038;post=24316&#038;subd=antinuclearinfo&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_411" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 106px"><a href="http://antinuclearinfo.files.wordpress.com/2008/08/a-cat-can.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-411" title="a-cat-can" src="http://antinuclearinfo.files.wordpress.com/2008/08/a-cat-can.jpg" alt="" width="96" height="96" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Christina Macpherson&#8217;s websites &amp; blogs</p></div>
<p><strong>Low level radiation research  Studies of the Mortality of Atomic Bomb Survivors, Report 14 </strong>finds that the linear theory of radiation holds good, –  as low doses increase, cancer risk increases.</p>
<p><strong>Japan</strong> The Oi municipal assembly passed a new resolution Monday to restart Unit 3 and 4 reactors. Anti nuclear activists determined to continue their struggle. Japan still may get through summer without nuclear power –  this would be a blow to nuclear and uranium industries.   Radiation levels continue to increase in Tokyo Bay.</p>
<p><strong>UK</strong>  Controversy over what to do with Britain’s huge amount of highly radioactive wastes. Govt offering incentives to counties to ‘welcome’ a waste dump.  Shepway District Council  wants the community to accept a waste dump on the wetlands of Romney Marsh in Kent – but is meeting much opposition.     UK government trying to give French nuclear company EDF a subsidy, but make it look like not a subsidy. UK govt wary about France’s new somewhat anti nuclear President.</p>
<p><strong>USA. </strong>The ORC International survey find that the majority of Americans, whether Republican or Democrat, want renewable energy, and the phasing out of coal and nuclear.  Military experts call for reduction in spending on nuclear weapons .   USA quietly weakens its nuclear emergency procedures New Vogtle nuclear power project runs into trouble – huge cost overrun and delay.</p>
<p><strong>India.</strong> A Member of Parliament calls for the scrapping of the nuclear power programme.</p>
<p><strong>Africa.</strong> Uranium miners striking for better conditions and wages in Malawi, Namibia and Niger.</p>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24316/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24316/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24316/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24316/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24316/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24316/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24316/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24316/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24316/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24316/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24316/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24316/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24316/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24316/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=nuclear-news.net&#038;blog=4114830&#038;post=24316&#038;subd=antinuclearinfo&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nuclear-news.net/2012/05/18/wrap-up-of-the-weeks-nuclear-news-8/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/432fc0d0ad6543e820e2dfcd39f76c35?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F0.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">ChristinaMac</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://antinuclearinfo.files.wordpress.com/2008/08/a-cat-can.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">a-cat-can</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Research report &#8211; low level radiation IS a cancer causer</title>
		<link>http://nuclear-news.net/2012/05/18/research-report-low-level-radiation-is-a-cancer-causer/</link>
		<comments>http://nuclear-news.net/2012/05/18/research-report-low-level-radiation-is-a-cancer-causer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 05:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christina MacPherson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nuclear-news.net/?p=24307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-VAncqK6bl0&#38;feature=share  Low-Dose Radiation ☢ NEW A-Bomb Study The most important finding regarding the late effects of A-bomb radiation exposure on mortality is an increased risk of cancer mortality throughout life Significant radiation-associated increases in risk have been seen for most sites of solid cancer. The dose–response relationship for these sites has tended to show an approximately linear increase with radiation [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=nuclear-news.net&#038;blog=4114830&#038;post=24307&#038;subd=antinuclearinfo&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<div>
<div>
<div><strong><a href="http://antinuclearinfo.files.wordpress.com/2008/07/youtube.gif"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-22158" title="YouTube" src="http://antinuclearinfo.files.wordpress.com/2008/07/youtube.gif" alt="" width="72" height="72" /></a><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-VAncqK6bl0&amp;feature=share" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-VAncqK6bl0&amp;feature=share</a></strong></p>
<h2> Low-Dose Radiation ☢ NEW A-Bomb Study</h2>
</div>
<div><em>The most important finding regarding the late effects of A-bomb radiation exposure on mortality is an increased risk </em><em>of cancer mortality throughout life</em></div>
<div></div>
<div><em>Significant radiation-associated increases in risk have been seen for most sites of solid cancer. The dose–response relationship for these sites has tended to show an approximately linear increase with radiation dose. The relative risks for many cancer sites were higher in those exposed as children. </em></div>
<div></div>
</div>
<div><strong><a href="http://antinuclearinfo.files.wordpress.com/2008/12/radiation-warning.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1004" title="radiation-warning" src="http://antinuclearinfo.files.wordpress.com/2008/12/radiation-warning.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="166" /></a>Studies of the Mortality of Atomic Bomb Survivors, Report 14, 1950–2003: <a href="http://www.rrjournal.org/doi/pdf/10.1667/RR2629.1" target="_blank">http://www rrjournal.org/doi/pdf/10.1667/RR2629.1</a> An Overview of Cancer and Noncancer Diseases</strong></div>
<div><em>Kotaro Ozasa, a,1 Yukiko Shimizu, a Akihiko Suyama, a Fumiyoshi Kasagi, a,b Midori Soda, a Eric J. Grant, a Ritsu Sakata, a </em><em>Hiromi Sugiyama a and Kazunori Kodama c a Department of Epidemiology and c Chief Scientist, Radiation Effects Research Foundation, 5-2 Hijiyama-koen, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 732-0815, Japan; and b Institute of Radiation Epidemiology, Radiation Effects Association 1-9-16, Kaji-cho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 101-0044, Japan</em></div>
</div>
<div></div>
<div>
<div>This is the 14th report in a series of periodic general reports on mortality in the Life Span Study (LSS) cohort of atomic bomb survivors followed by the Radiation Effects Research Foundation to investigate the late health effects of the radiation from the atomic bombs. During the period 1950–2003, 58% of the 86,611 LSS cohort members with DS02 dose estimates have died.</div>
<div></div>
<div>The 6 years of additional follow-up since the previous report provide substantially more information at longer periods after radiation exposure (17% more cancer deaths), especially among those under age 10 at exposure (58% more deaths)……<span id="more-24307"></span><!--more--></div>
</div>
<div></div>
<div>
<div>The most important finding regarding the late effects of A-bomb radiation exposure on mortality is an increased risk of cancer mortality throughout life (2). The rates of excess solid cancer deaths have continued to increase in approximate proportion to radiation dose as the cohort ages.</div>
<div>Significant radiation-associated increases in risk have been seen for most sites of solid cancer. The dose–response relationship for these sites has tended to show an approximately linear increase with radiation dose. The relative risks for many cancer sites were higher in those exposed as children. The relative risks declined with increasing attained age of the subjects as well as the number of years after the bombing, although the excess absolute rates continued to increase with attained age…..</div>
</div>
<p>–</p>
</div>
<div>
<div>The most important finding regarding the late effects of A-bomb radiation exposure on mortality is an increased risk</div>
<div>of cancer mortality throughout life (2). The current data showed that the risk for all solid cancer deaths has</div>
<div>continued to increase throughout the survivors’ lifetimes in approximate proportion to radiation dose. The sexaveraged relative excess of solid cancer deaths was 42% per Gy at age 70 years after exposure at age 30 based on a linear model with effect modification by age at exposure and</div>
<div>attained age. The sex-averaged excess death rate of all solid</div>
<div>cancer was 26/10,000 person-years per Gy under the same</div>
<div>conditions. The second important finding is that those who were exposed at younger ages had a higher relative risk for</div>
<div>cancer death; e.g., the sex-averaged ERR of solid cancer</div>
<div>deaths was 0.83 at age 70 in those who were exposed at 10</div>
<div>years of age compared with 0.30 in those exposed at age 40……</div>
</div>
<div></div>
<div>
<div>Effect modification was evaluated for the ERR (Table 4)</div>
<div>and EAR (Table 5) models. The ERR estimates were substantially higher for women than men..</div>
<div>
<div>. The highest ERR was observed for cancer of the renal</div>
<div>pelvis and ureter, then cancers of the breast (female only),</div>
<div>other digestive system, bladder, ovary (female only), lung,</div>
<div>colon, esophagus, gall bladder, liver and stomach in</div>
<div>descending order</div>
</div>
<div></div>
<div></div>
<div>… In conclusion, the risk of death from malignant neoplasms</div>
<div>in most sites and selected noncancer diseases increased in a</div>
<div>dose-dependent fashion among LSS subjects over the period</div>
<div>1950–2003. The relative risk of radiation for solid cancer</div>
<div>was largest among those exposed at young ages. The results</div>
<div>of this study, which extended the observations for 6 years,</div>
<div>are consistent with previous reports and continue to show</div>
<div>increased cancer risks throughout the survivors’ lifetimes.</div>
<div>Since epidemiological evaluation can be done only after the</div>
<div>development of outcomes, we sincerely pay our respects to</div>
<div>those who have died. It would be our pleasure if</div>
<div>clarification of late health effects of A-bomb radiation</div>
<div>could offer fundamental information for the survivors’</div>
<div>welfare</div>
</div>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24307/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24307/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24307/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24307/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24307/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24307/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24307/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24307/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24307/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24307/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24307/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24307/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24307/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24307/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=nuclear-news.net&#038;blog=4114830&#038;post=24307&#038;subd=antinuclearinfo&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nuclear-news.net/2012/05/18/research-report-low-level-radiation-is-a-cancer-causer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/432fc0d0ad6543e820e2dfcd39f76c35?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F0.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">ChristinaMac</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://antinuclearinfo.files.wordpress.com/2008/07/youtube.gif" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">YouTube</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://antinuclearinfo.files.wordpress.com/2008/12/radiation-warning.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">radiation-warning</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Despite Fukushima, USA inexplicably weakening its nuclear emergency procedures</title>
		<link>http://nuclear-news.net/2012/05/18/despite-fukushima-usa-inexplicably-weakening-its-nuclear-emergency-procedures/</link>
		<comments>http://nuclear-news.net/2012/05/18/despite-fukushima-usa-inexplicably-weakening-its-nuclear-emergency-procedures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 05:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christina MacPherson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[safety and incidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nuclear-news.net/?p=24278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ The latest changes, especially relaxed exercise plans for 50-mile emergency zones, are being flayed by some local planners and activists who say the widespread contamination in Japan from last year&#8217;s Fukushima nuclear accident screams out for stronger planning in the United States, not weaker rules&#8230;&#8230; Evacs and drills pared near nuke plants, Bloomberg, By JEFF DONN, 17 May 12, Without fanfare, [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=nuclear-news.net&#038;blog=4114830&#038;post=24278&#038;subd=antinuclearinfo&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em> The latest changes, especially relaxed exercise plans for 50-mile emergency zones, are being flayed by some local planners and activists who say the widespread contamination in Japan from last year&#8217;s Fukushima nuclear accident screams out for stronger planning in the</em> <em>United States, not weaker rules&#8230;&#8230; </em></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://antinuclearinfo.files.wordpress.com/2009/02/safety-symbol1.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-1490" title="safety-symbol1" src="http://antinuclearinfo.files.wordpress.com/2009/02/safety-symbol1.jpg?w=150&h=92" alt="" width="150" height="92" /></a>Evacs and drills pared near nuke plants, <em>Bloomberg, By JEFF DONN, 17 May 12,</em></strong><em> </em>Without fanfare, the nation&#8217;s nuclear power regulators have overhauled community emergency planning for the first time in more than three decades, requiring fewer exercises for major accidents and recommending that fewer people be evacuated right away.</p>
<p>The revamp, the first since the program began after Three Mile Island in 1979, also eliminates a requirement that local responders always practice for a release of radiation.<br />
At least four years in the works, the changes appear to clash with more recent lessons of last year&#8217;s reactor crisis in Japan.<span id="more-24278"></span></p>
<p>Under the new rules, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the Federal<br />
Emergency Management Agency, which run the program together, have<br />
added one new exercise: More than a decade after the 9/11 terrorist<br />
attacks, state and community police will now take part in exercises<br />
that prepare for a possible assault on their local plant.<br />
Still, some emergency officials say this new exercise doesn&#8217;t go far enough.</p>
<p>And some view as downright bizarre the idea that communities will now<br />
periodically run emergency scenarios without practicing for any<br />
significant release of radiation.</p>
<p>These changes, while documented in obscure federal publications, went<br />
into effect in December with hardly any notice by the general public.</p>
<p>An Associated Press investigative series in June exposed weaknesses in<br />
the U.S. emergency planning program. The stories detailed how many<br />
nuclear reactors are now operating beyond their design life under<br />
rules that have been relaxed to account for deteriorating safety<br />
margins. The series also documented considerable population growth<br />
around nuclear power plants and limitations in the scope of exercises.<br />
For example, local authorities assemble at command centers where they<br />
test communications, but they do not deploy around the community,<br />
reroute traffic or evacuate anyone as in a real emergency.</p>
<p>The latest changes, especially relaxed exercise plans for 50-mile emergency zones, are being flayed by some local planners and activists who say the widespread contamination in Japan from last year&#8217;s Fukushima nuclear accident screams out for stronger planning in the<br />
United States, not weaker rules&#8230;&#8230;<br />
The Japanese disaster reinforced such worries when officials told some<br />
towns beyond 12 miles from the disabled plant to evacuate. The U.S.<br />
government recommended that Americans stay at least 50 miles from the<br />
plant. Soil and crops were contaminated for scores of miles around. At<br />
one point, health authorities in Tokyo, 140 miles away, advised<br />
families not to give children the local water, which was contaminated<br />
by fallout to twice the government limit for infants&#8230;.<br />
<a href="http://www.businessweek.com/ap/2012-05/D9UPSAI00.htm" target="_blank">http://www.businessweek.com/ap/2012-05/D9UPSAI00.htm</a></p>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24278/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24278/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24278/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24278/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24278/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24278/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24278/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24278/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24278/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24278/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24278/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24278/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24278/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24278/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=nuclear-news.net&#038;blog=4114830&#038;post=24278&#038;subd=antinuclearinfo&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nuclear-news.net/2012/05/18/despite-fukushima-usa-inexplicably-weakening-its-nuclear-emergency-procedures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/432fc0d0ad6543e820e2dfcd39f76c35?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F0.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">ChristinaMac</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://antinuclearinfo.files.wordpress.com/2009/02/safety-symbol1.jpg?w=150" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">safety-symbol1</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>UK&#8217;s nuclear waste could fill 5 Royal Albert Halls</title>
		<link>http://nuclear-news.net/2012/05/18/uks-nuclear-waste-could-fill-5-royal-albert-halls/</link>
		<comments>http://nuclear-news.net/2012/05/18/uks-nuclear-waste-could-fill-5-royal-albert-halls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 05:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christina MacPherson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[general]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nuclear-news.net/?p=24305</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who will bury Britain&#8217;s nuclear waste in their backyard? The Telegraph, 17 May 12, A quiet and scenic corner of Kent is asking residents to let it be the country&#8217;s first Nuclear Research and Disposal Facility. By Louise Gray9  17 May 2012 &#8220;&#8230;..  Even without building any more nuclear power stations, we now have enough radioactive waste to fill the Royal [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=nuclear-news.net&#038;blog=4114830&#038;post=24305&#038;subd=antinuclearinfo&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://antinuclearinfo.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/wastes.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-3650" title="wastes" src="http://antinuclearinfo.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/wastes.jpg" alt="" width="72" height="58" /></a><a href="http://antinuclearinfo.files.wordpress.com/2010/10/flag-uk.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-10526" title="flag-UK" src="http://antinuclearinfo.files.wordpress.com/2010/10/flag-uk.jpg" alt="" width="72" height="54" /></a>Who will bury Britain&#8217;s nuclear waste in their backyard?<em> The Telegraph, 17 May 12,</em> </strong>A quiet and scenic corner of Kent is asking residents to let it be the country&#8217;s first Nuclear Research and Disposal Facility. By Louise Gray9  17 May 2012 &#8220;&#8230;..  Even without building any more nuclear power stations, we now have enough radioactive waste to fill the Royal Albert Hall five times over. The bulk of our high level waste – the most radioactive – is kept in spent fuel ponds at existing power stations, principally Sellafield.</p>
<p>More than 60 years after the dawn of the nuclear age, no civil nuclear waste has yet been disposed of permanently underground anywhere in the world. Governments have struggled to find any local population willing to risk the dangers of radioactivity &#8230;..</p>
<p>The Department for Energy and Climate Change asked councils to “volunteer” to store nuclear waste four years ago, following the “Managing Radioactive Waste Safely” White Paper. The request was met with silence, until three West Cumbrian councils suggested that they might be willing to store more waste around the existing Sellafield power station.</p>
<p>Now Shepway district council has also expressed an interest in the £12 billion project. But first the local community must be persuaded, before a formal expression of interest can be put forward this September; this would be followed by a lengthy consultation and<br />
investigations into the geological viability of the area. The sweetener for the locals would be jobs: Romney Marsh has double the levels of unemployment of the rest of rural Kent&#8230;.<br />
Energy companies say that nuclear waste transported by train would be<br />
stored in special flasks that would protect it in an accident.<br />
However, protesters fear terrorist attacks, natural disasters or even simple human mistakes still risk a leak of radioactive waste&#8230;..</p>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24305/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24305/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24305/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24305/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24305/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24305/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24305/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24305/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24305/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24305/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24305/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24305/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24305/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24305/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=nuclear-news.net&#038;blog=4114830&#038;post=24305&#038;subd=antinuclearinfo&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nuclear-news.net/2012/05/18/uks-nuclear-waste-could-fill-5-royal-albert-halls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/432fc0d0ad6543e820e2dfcd39f76c35?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F0.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">ChristinaMac</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://antinuclearinfo.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/wastes.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">wastes</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://antinuclearinfo.files.wordpress.com/2010/10/flag-uk.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">flag-UK</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Large scale study shows Australia is warming, due to global greenhouse emissions</title>
		<link>http://nuclear-news.net/2012/05/18/large-scale-study-shows-australia-is-warming-due-to-global-greenhouse-emissions/</link>
		<comments>http://nuclear-news.net/2012/05/18/large-scale-study-shows-australia-is-warming-due-to-global-greenhouse-emissions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 05:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christina MacPherson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AUSTRALIA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nuclear-news.net/?p=24303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“Our study revealed that recent warming in a 1,000-year context is highly unusual and cannot be explained by natural factors alone, suggesting a strong influence of human-caused climate change in the Australasian region,”  1,000 years of climate data confirms Australia’s warming  http://phys.org/news/2012-05-years-climate-australia.html  May 17, 2012 By Alvin Stone In the first study of its kind in Australasia, scientists [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=nuclear-news.net&#038;blog=4114830&#038;post=24303&#038;subd=antinuclearinfo&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>“Our study revealed that recent warming in a 1,000-year context is highly unusual and cannot be explained by natural factors alone, suggesting a strong influence of human-caused climate change in the Australasian region,” </em></p>
<p><strong>1,000 years of climate data confirms Australia’s warming  <a href="http://phys.org/news/2012-05-years-climate-australia.html" target="_blank">http://phys.org/news/2012-05-years-climate-australia.html</a> </strong><em> <strong>May 17, 2012 By Alvin Stone</strong></em> In the first study of its kind in Australasia, scientists used 27 natural climate records to create the first large-scale temperature reconstruction for the region over the past 1,000 years. The study led by researchers at the University of Melbourne, used a range of natural indicators including tree rings, corals and ice cores to study Australasian temperatures over the past millennium. They then compared these with climate model simulations.</p>
<p>Dr. Stephen Phipps, a researcher with UNSW’s <a href="http://phys.org/tags/climate+change/" rel="tag" target="_blank">Climate Change</a> Research Centre and the Centre of Excellence for Climate System Science led the climate model simulation research. He said the results showed there were no other warm periods in the past 1,000 years that match the warming experienced in Australasia since 1950.<span id="more-24303"></span></p>
<p>“Our study revealed that recent warming in a 1,000-year context is highly unusual and cannot be explained by natural factors alone, suggesting a strong influence of human-caused climate change in the Australasian region,” Dr. Phipps said.</p>
<p>The study published in the <em><a href="http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/abs/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00649.1" target="_blank">Journal of Climate</a></em> will form the Australasian region’s contribution to the 5th IPCC climate change assessment report chapter on past climate.</p>
<p>Lead researcher, Dr. Joelle Gergis from the University of Melbourne said using  ‘palaeoclimate’ or natural records, such as tree rings, corals and ice cores, are fundamental in evaluating regional and global climate variability over centuries before direct temperature records started in 1910.</p>
<p>Dr. Gergis collated these natural records provided by decades of work by more than 30 researchers from Australia, New Zealand and around the world.</p>
<p>The reconstruction was developed using 27 natural climate records calculated in 3,000 different ways to ensure that the results were robust.</p>
<p>She said reconstructions of regional temperature not only provide a climate picture of the past but also a significant platform to reduce uncertainties associated with future climate variability.</p>
<p>The study is part of a global collaboration, PAGES, Past Global Changes Regional 2K initiative, which is working to reconstruct the past 2,000 years of climate across every region in the world in order to reduce uncertainties associated with future climate change projections.</p>
<p>Collaborators include the Climate Change Research Centre and the ARC Centre of Excellence for Climate System Science, University of New South Wales where the climate modelling was conducted.</p>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24303/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24303/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24303/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24303/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24303/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24303/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24303/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24303/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24303/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24303/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24303/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24303/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24303/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24303/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=nuclear-news.net&#038;blog=4114830&#038;post=24303&#038;subd=antinuclearinfo&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nuclear-news.net/2012/05/18/large-scale-study-shows-australia-is-warming-due-to-global-greenhouse-emissions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/432fc0d0ad6543e820e2dfcd39f76c35?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F0.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">ChristinaMac</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The long struggle against nuclear power in Japan</title>
		<link>http://nuclear-news.net/2012/05/18/the-long-struggle-against-nuclear-power-in-japan/</link>
		<comments>http://nuclear-news.net/2012/05/18/the-long-struggle-against-nuclear-power-in-japan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 05:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christina MacPherson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opposition to nuclear]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nuclear-news.net/?p=24301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Environmentalists, meanwhile, say they remain undaunted by the Oi decision, which has become a watershed moment in their activism.  Activists Brace for Long War Against Nuclear Power, By Suvendrini Kakuchi TOKYO, May 17, 2012 (IPS) &#8211; For the past two decades Masao Ishiji (59), has been fighting tooth and nail to ban the operation of four nuclear [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=nuclear-news.net&#038;blog=4114830&#038;post=24301&#038;subd=antinuclearinfo&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Environmentalists, meanwhile, say they remain undaunted by the Oi decision, which has become a watershed moment in their activism. </em></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://antinuclearinfo.files.wordpress.com/2011/05/protestor-japan.gif"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-16280" title="protestor-Japan" src="http://antinuclearinfo.files.wordpress.com/2011/05/protestor-japan.gif?w=150&h=94" alt="" width="150" height="94" /></a>Activists Brace for Long War Against Nuclear Power,<em> By Suvendrini Kakuchi TOKYO, May 17, 2012 (IPS)</em></strong> &#8211; For the past two decades Masao Ishiji (59), has been fighting tooth and nail to ban the operation of four nuclear reactors that dot the western coastline of Oi in the Fukui prefecture facing the Japan Sea.</p>
<p>Earlier this week, that desperate battle reached a critical front. When the Oi municipal assembly passed a new resolution Monday to restart Unit 3 and 4 reactors that had been closed for a year for stress tests, anti-nuclear activists knew they had reached a crucial juncture in their fight to eradicate nuclear power from the country. <span id="more-24301"></span></p>
<p>&#8220;The new Oi decision is a blow to the anti-nuclear movement,&#8221; explained Yuki Sekimoto of Greenpeace, Japan. &#8221; It is also a stark reminder of the excruciating position faced by the local residents. They have to chose between their jobs or stopping nuclear power, a very unfair situation.&#8221; &#8230;.<!--more--><br />
Local surveys conducted by Ishiji and his supporters from Wakasa, a town of 9000 people sandwiched between the Oi reactors, indicate residents are torn between loosing their jobs and facing a possible accident similar to the Fukushima Daiichi catastrophe caused by a massive earthquake and tsunami last March.</p>
<p>More than 90 percent of the 400 people polled said they were concerned about the lack of a safe evacuation plan in the face of another earthquake severe enough to damage reactors.</p>
<p>But the risk of ordinary people like local shopkeepers and innkeepers, who cater to the nuclear industry, loosing their jobs, also remains a grave threat.</p>
<p>&#8220;These are their biggest concerns. The Oi decision to restart the reactors has created a tense situation in the surrounding areas,&#8221; Ishiji reported at a large meeting of anti-nuclear NGOs in Tokyo on Tuesday. &#8230;.<br />
The building of reactors was accompanied by generous subsidies from the central government for the construction of roads, schools and other infrastructure that brought jobs and revitalised the local economy&#8230;.</p>
<div>Environmentalists, meanwhile, say they remain undaunted by the Oi decision, which has become a watershed moment in their activism.</p>
<p>Aileen Smith from Green Action, a leading environment organisation, said that Fukushima was a brutal awakening for many to nuclear power&#8217;s fatal toll on humanity and the environment.</p>
<p>Additionally, &#8220;Fighting against nuclear power is closely linked to supporting <a href="http://ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=104978" target="_blank">employment</a>,&#8221; said Ishiji who is now advocating for the development of alternative energy sources in Fukui. <a href="http://ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=107821" target="_blank">http://ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=107821</a></div>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24301/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24301/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24301/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24301/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24301/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24301/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24301/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24301/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24301/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24301/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24301/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24301/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24301/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24301/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=nuclear-news.net&#038;blog=4114830&#038;post=24301&#038;subd=antinuclearinfo&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nuclear-news.net/2012/05/18/the-long-struggle-against-nuclear-power-in-japan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/432fc0d0ad6543e820e2dfcd39f76c35?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F0.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">ChristinaMac</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://antinuclearinfo.files.wordpress.com/2011/05/protestor-japan.gif?w=150" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">protestor-Japan</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Majority of Americans want renewable energy, see USA politics as corrupt</title>
		<link>http://nuclear-news.net/2012/05/18/majority-of-americans-want-renewable-energy-see-usa-politics-as-corrupt/</link>
		<comments>http://nuclear-news.net/2012/05/18/majority-of-americans-want-renewable-energy-see-usa-politics-as-corrupt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 04:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christina MacPherson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ENERGY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opposition to nuclear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reference]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nuclear-news.net/?p=24299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the public has clearly picked up on the fact that corrupt politics is a key reason we don’t have more of that. 82% of Americans (69% of Republicans, 84% of Independents, and 95% of Democrats) agree with this statement: “The time is now for a new, grassroots-driven politics to realize a renewable energy future. 76% of Americans Want Clean Energy [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=nuclear-news.net&#038;blog=4114830&#038;post=24299&#038;subd=antinuclearinfo&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>the public has clearly picked up on the fact that corrupt politics is a key reason we don’t have more of that. 82% of Americans (69% of Republicans, 84% of Independents, and 95% of Democrats) agree with this statement: “The time is now for a new, grassroots-driven politics to realize a renewable energy future.</em></p>
<p><strong><span style="color:#ff0000;">76% of Americans Want Clean Energy Instead of Nuclear, Natural Gas, &amp; Coal </span><em>Clean Technica MAY 15, 2012 BY ZACHARY SHAHAN </em></strong> Yet another recent poll showed that Americans really support clean energy, across political affiliations (though, there’s clearly more support on the left).</p>
<p>The ORC International survey, conducted for the nonprofit and nonpartisan Civil Society Institute (CSI), found that 76% of Americans (58% of Republicans, 83% of Independents, and 88% of Democrats) want to see ”a reduction in our reliance on nuclear power, natural gas and coal, and instead, launch a national initiative to boost renewable energy and energy efficiency.” (And who knows what the remaining 24% are smoking?)<span id="more-24299"></span></p>
<p>Not only that, the public has clearly picked up on the fact that corrupt politics is a key reason we don’t have more of that. 82% of Americans (69% of Republicans, 84% of Independents, and 95% of Democrats) agree with this statement: “The time is now for a new, grassroots-driven politics to realize a renewable energy future.<br />
Congress is debating large public investments in energy and we need to<br />
take action to ensure that our taxpayer dollars support renewable<br />
energy– one that protects public health, promotes energy independence<br />
and the economic well being of all Americans.”</p>
<p>Wow. I’m shocked that such a high percentage of Americans is behind a<br />
“grassroots-driven politics.”</p>
<p>“Our survey is a call to action:  Americans across the political<br />
spectrum think that it is time for decisive action toward a renewable<br />
energy future that will protect public health and provide reliable and<br />
cost effective energy,” Pam Solo, founder and president, Civil Society<br />
Institute, said….<br />
<a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2012/05/15/76-of-americans-want-clean-energy-instead-of-nuclear-natural-gas-coal/" target="_blank">http://cleantechnica.com/2012/05/15/76-of-americans-want-clean-energy-instead-of-nuclear-natural-gas-coal/</a></p>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24299/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24299/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24299/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24299/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24299/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24299/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24299/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24299/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24299/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24299/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24299/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24299/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24299/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24299/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=nuclear-news.net&#038;blog=4114830&#038;post=24299&#038;subd=antinuclearinfo&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nuclear-news.net/2012/05/18/majority-of-americans-want-renewable-energy-see-usa-politics-as-corrupt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/432fc0d0ad6543e820e2dfcd39f76c35?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F0.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">ChristinaMac</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>USA prepared to strike Iran</title>
		<link>http://nuclear-news.net/2012/05/18/usa-prepared-to-strike-iran/</link>
		<comments>http://nuclear-news.net/2012/05/18/usa-prepared-to-strike-iran/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 04:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christina MacPherson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weapons and war]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nuclear-news.net/?p=24297</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[US ready to strike Iran, says envoy, SMH, Amy Teibel May 18, 2012 - The US has plans in place to attack Iran if necessary to prevent it from developing nuclear weapons, Washington&#8217;s envoy to Israel says, days ahead of a crucial round of nuclear talks with Tehran&#8230;. &#8230; Iran says its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes, like energy [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=nuclear-news.net&#038;blog=4114830&#038;post=24297&#038;subd=antinuclearinfo&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>US ready to strike Iran, says envoy,<em> SMH, Amy Teibel May 18, 2012</em></strong><em> -</em> The US has plans in place to attack Iran if necessary to prevent it from developing nuclear weapons, Washington&#8217;s envoy to Israel says, days ahead of a crucial round of nuclear talks with Tehran&#8230;.<span id="more-24297"></span><!--more--><br />
&#8230; Iran says its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes, like<br />
energy production. The US and Israel suspect Iran is pursuing nuclear<br />
weapons, but differences have emerged in how to persuade Tehran to<br />
curb its program.</p>
<p>Washington says diplomacy and economic sanctions must be given a<br />
chance to run its course, and is taking the lead in the ongoing talks<br />
between six global powers and Iran.</p>
<p>Israel, while saying it would prefer a diplomatic solution, has<br />
expressed scepticism about these talks and says time is running out<br />
for military action to be effective.</p>
<p>President Barack Obama has assured Israel that the US is prepared to<br />
take military action if necessary, and it is standard procedure for<br />
armies to draw up plans for a broad range of possible scenarios. But<br />
Shapiro&#8217;s comments were the most explicit sign yet that preparations<br />
have been stepped up.</p>
<p>The five permanent members of the UN Security Council and Germany are<br />
gearing up to for a May 23 meeting with Iran in Baghdad. Shortly after<br />
the meeting, the UN atomic agency is to release its latest report card<br />
on Iran&#8217;s nuclear efforts.</p>
<p>In Tehran on Thursday, top nuclear negotiator Saeed Jalili warned<br />
against Western pressure at next week&#8217;s talks, which are a follow-up<br />
to negotiations in Istanbul last month that all sides praised as<br />
positive&#8230;. <a href="http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-world/us-ready-to-strike-iran-says-envoy-20120518-1yu1l.html" target="_blank">http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-world/us-ready-to-strike-iran-says-envoy-20120518-1yu1l.html</a></p>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24297/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24297/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24297/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24297/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24297/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24297/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24297/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24297/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24297/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24297/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24297/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24297/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24297/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24297/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=nuclear-news.net&#038;blog=4114830&#038;post=24297&#038;subd=antinuclearinfo&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nuclear-news.net/2012/05/18/usa-prepared-to-strike-iran/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/432fc0d0ad6543e820e2dfcd39f76c35?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F0.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">ChristinaMac</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>UK government wooing county Kent to accept nuclear waste dump</title>
		<link>http://nuclear-news.net/2012/05/18/uk-government-wooing-county-kent-to-accept-nuclear-waste-dump/</link>
		<comments>http://nuclear-news.net/2012/05/18/uk-government-wooing-county-kent-to-accept-nuclear-waste-dump/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 04:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christina MacPherson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[UK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wastes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nuclear-news.net/?p=24293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wetlands of Romney Marsh in Kent could become new home of nuclear waste dump Mail Online, By SUZANNAH HILLS, 17 May 2012 The wildlife-rich wetlands of Romney Marsh in Kent could become the home of an underground nuclear waste dumping ground if government plans get the go ahead. Thousands of letters have been sent by Shepway District Council to residents [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=nuclear-news.net&#038;blog=4114830&#038;post=24293&#038;subd=antinuclearinfo&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://antinuclearinfo.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/waste-bunker-kent-uk.gif"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-24259" title="waste-bunker-Kent-UK" src="http://antinuclearinfo.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/waste-bunker-kent-uk.gif?w=300&h=168" alt="" width="300" height="168" /></a><span style="color:#ff0000;">Wetlands of Romney Marsh in Kent could become new home of nuclear waste dump</span> <em>Mail Online, By SUZANNAH HILLS, 17 May 2012</em></strong><em> </em>The wildlife-rich wetlands of Romney Marsh in Kent could become the home of an underground nuclear waste dumping ground if government plans get the go ahead.<br />
Thousands of letters have been sent by Shepway District Council to residents living in the area as part of a consultation over the proposal for a multi-million pound Nuclear Research and Disposal Facility.<br />
Under the plans, hazardous nuclear waste would be buried between 200m to 1000m below the ground in underground vaults, while a research facility would be constructed on the surface&#8230;. <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2145628/Wetlands-Romney-Marsh-Kent-new-home-nuclear-waste-dump.html#ixzz1vGB2CiZp" target="_blank">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2145628/Wetlands-Romney-Marsh-Kent-new-home-nuclear-waste-dump.html#ixzz1vGB2CiZp</a></p>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24293/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24293/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24293/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24293/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24293/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24293/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24293/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24293/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24293/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24293/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24293/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24293/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24293/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24293/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=nuclear-news.net&#038;blog=4114830&#038;post=24293&#038;subd=antinuclearinfo&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nuclear-news.net/2012/05/18/uk-government-wooing-county-kent-to-accept-nuclear-waste-dump/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/432fc0d0ad6543e820e2dfcd39f76c35?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F0.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">ChristinaMac</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://antinuclearinfo.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/waste-bunker-kent-uk.gif?w=300" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">waste-bunker-Kent-UK</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>UK dispute over plan for nuclear waste dump in Kent</title>
		<link>http://nuclear-news.net/2012/05/18/uk-dispute-over-plan-for-nuclear-waste-dump-in-kent/</link>
		<comments>http://nuclear-news.net/2012/05/18/uk-dispute-over-plan-for-nuclear-waste-dump-in-kent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 04:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christina MacPherson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[general]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nuclear-news.net/?p=24291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Row over nuclear waste dump proposal in Kent Romney Marshes mooted as site for Britain&#8217;s first store of high-level radioactive material by Shepway council in Kent Terry Macalister guardian.co.uk,  17 May 2012 A furious row has broken out among local politicians over a proposal to build a nuclear waste dump in Kent. Romney Marshes is being mooted as a site for [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=nuclear-news.net&#038;blog=4114830&#038;post=24291&#038;subd=antinuclearinfo&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="color:#ff0000;"><strong><a href="http://antinuclearinfo.files.wordpress.com/2011/05/wastes-1.gif"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-15715" title="wastes-1" src="http://antinuclearinfo.files.wordpress.com/2011/05/wastes-1.gif?w=150&h=51" alt="" width="150" height="51" /></a>Row over nuclear waste dump proposal in Kent</strong></span> <strong>Romney Marshes mooted as site for Britain&#8217;s first store of high-level radioactive material by Shepway council in Kent <em>Terry Macalister <a href="http://guardian.co.uk/" target="_blank">guardian.co.uk</a>,  17 May 2012</em></strong> A furious row has broken out among local politicians over a proposal to build a <a title="More from guardian.co.uk on Nuclear waste" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/nuclear-waste" target="_blank">nuclear waste</a> dump in Kent.</p>
<p>Romney Marshes is being mooted as a site for Britain&#8217;s first store for high-level radioactive materials by members of Shepway district council but the move has infuriated the leader of Kent county council and a local MP.</p>
<p>&#8220;Let&#8217;s not sell Romney Marsh short; I believe it has and deserves a better future than being the dumping ground for all of Britain&#8217;s high level nuclear <a title="More from guardian.co.uk on Waste" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/waste" target="_blank">waste</a>,&#8221; said Damian Collins, MP for Folkestone and Hythe, on his own <a title="" href="http://www.damiancollins.com/2012/05/no-to-a-nuclear-waste-dump-on-romney-marsh/" target="_blank">website</a>.</p>
<p>&#8220;Shepway council has started a consultation to ask whether residents want to find out more about building this underground storage facility here and my view, and that of the Marsh&#8217;s county councillor Carole Waters, is that the answer should be &#8216;no&#8217;.&#8221;</p>
<p>Paul Carter, leader of Kent council, told a local website, <a title="" href="http://www.thisiskent.co.uk/home" target="_blank">thisiskent</a>, it would be &#8220;utter madness&#8221; to even consider building such a facility in an area which he said was &#8220;both an earthquake zone and one of the busiest shipping lanes in the world&#8221;&#8230;. <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/may/17/row-nuclear-waste-dump-proposal" target="_blank">http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/may/17/row-nuclear-waste-dump-proposal</a></p>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24291/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24291/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24291/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24291/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24291/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24291/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24291/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24291/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24291/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24291/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24291/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24291/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24291/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/antinuclearinfo.wordpress.com/24291/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=nuclear-news.net&#038;blog=4114830&#038;post=24291&#038;subd=antinuclearinfo&#038;ref=&#038;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nuclear-news.net/2012/05/18/uk-dispute-over-plan-for-nuclear-waste-dump-in-kent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/432fc0d0ad6543e820e2dfcd39f76c35?s=96&#38;d=http%3A%2F%2F0.gravatar.com%2Favatar%2Fad516503a11cd5ca435acc9bb6523536%3Fs%3D96" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">ChristinaMac</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://antinuclearinfo.files.wordpress.com/2011/05/wastes-1.gif?w=150" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">wastes-1</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
