Success of the anti nuclear, clean energy movement – theme for November 2011
The worldwide nuclear mafia now faces the rising economic success of 21st Century renewable energy technologies, alongside the plummeting economic failure of nuclear energy.
The corporate power system that dominates the world economy, and world politics still promotes nuclear power and nuclear weapons – but they know they are up against the unaffordable financial costs. Money is what matters to them.
But money is not the whole story. The nuclear lobby consists of relatively few individuals – middle aged (mainly white) men, in business suits, in love with their own careers and monetary gain.
They don’t know who they’re up against – people in their millions who oppose the nuclear industry- people who “don’t matter” – women, young people, poor indigenous people
These millions include the poorly educated, and the highly educated, people of all colours, languages and religions -but all having respect for their precious land and water, and for the future of the world’s children. They matter, and they will prevail.
Nuclear Power – the battle for hearts and minds – public opinion, Sept 11
So far, the nuclear lobby has bought the hearts and minds of governments, but has not won the hearts and minds of the people. In a propaganda war, as in all wars, truth is the first victim. But there are many journalists and others out there who will counter the lies of the nuclear industry.
Today, across the world, the nuclear industry is unpopular. It is particularly unpopular with women, and with indigenous peoples. It’s unpopular with those who have suffered from it, such as the veterans who attended nuclear bomb tests, and the ‘downwinders’ who suffered from those same tests. It’s unpopular with families afflicted with cancer from uranium mining. It’s unpopular with Ukrainians and Japanese whose lives have been disrupted by nuclear disasters.
The nuclear industry is also unpopular higher up in the social food chain. Many academics, economists, scientists, and doctors are concerned about the dangers of all kinds that are intrinsic to the nuclear industry.
So who does like the nuclear industry? – careerists in the nuclear industry, careerists in politics, academia, careerists in the Murdoch media, highly paid uranium workers, communities that exist only because of mining, - (the latter can’t really afford not to support it).
The nuclear industry, following in the footsteps of the tobacco and asbestos industries will now blanket its servant mass media, and any other possible avenues – such as education, and politics, - with propaganda.
The main focus of the nuclear lobby’s propaganda? This will be RADIATION. Right from 1945 onwards, the nuclear lobby has obscured the truth about the health effects of ionising radiation. Now they are stepping this up -even funding dodgy research to portray “low level radiation” as “good for you”
They’re spending an awful lot of money on this. Despite this huge investment in deception, the nuclear lobby is not winning.
Nuclear Power and PUBLIC OPINION – theme for September 2011
The nuclear industry is in top gear, trying to win the hearts and minds of people. But, it’s not succeeding. Sadly, it is winning (through expensive lobbying and funding) the hearts and minds of politicians - and of course, all those whose career depends on nuclear power.
The nuclear lobby is not keen on public opinion polling. And for good reason. The most recent global polling comes up with 62% of people worldwide. opposed to nuclear power.
Of course, this poll is not totally accurate, in every detail. And there are gaps – what do the people think, in totalitarian China, or Iran?
But, it must be a worry to the nuclear industry, that so many scientists, from so many disciplines – medical, climate, environmental, radiological, now oppose nuclear power. Not to mention the economists, who point out the costs of the total nuclear fuel cycle.
In the coming months, the nuclear lobby will go all out to change public opinion. Their biggest push will be to downplay the health effects of ionising radiation, and to push the continuing Fukushima radiation disaster onto the back burner – or preferably get the mass media to forget Fukushima.
The nuclear lobby will even push the idea that nuclear radiation is beneficial – even is a prevention and a treatment for various illnesses.
But it will be an uphill fight, for the global trend is now to distrust the nuclear industry, and for good reason.
NUCLEAR POWER and NUCLEAR WEAPONS – theme for August 2011
2011 marks the 15th anniversary of the International Court of Justice’s landmark advisory opinion on the legality of the threat or use of nuclear weapons. The court unanimously held that nations have a legal obligation to pursue in good faith and bring to a conclusion negotiations for the complete elimination of nuclear weapons under strict and effective international control…..
The recent nuclear power crisis in Fukushima has alerted governments and public across the world to the inherent dangers of nuclear technology for electricity production. ICAN points out that the starting material is the same and the effects of radiation are completely indiscriminate and identical whether it is radiation from a nuclear reactor or a nuclear bomb. …http://www.indepthnews.net/news/news.php?key1=2011-07-15%2015:26:30&key2=1
NUCLEAR POWER – WEAPONS AND WAR – theme for August 2011
“Now I am become death, the destroyer of worlds.” - J. Robert Oppenheimer, scientist and “father of the bomb”
On the morning of 6 August 1945, the first atomic bomb, code-named “Little Boy” was dropped by the United States on the Japanese city of Hiroshima. Three days later the United States dropped a plutonium bomb code-named “Fat Man” on the city of Nagasaki. 140,000 people (almost all civilians) died in Hiroshima either immediately or within a few days. Deaths in Nagasaki were about 74,000. The survivors lived on, some with horrifying burns scars, some to die of radiation-induced illnesses
Following the war, many scientists involved in the atomic bomb project, turned to the “atoms for peace” program – nuclear power. They did this partly out of guilt, partly to continue to be employed. (Where would a nuclear physicist get a job, otherwise? Well, some were happy to continue with nuclear weapons development)
Nuclear weapons are an inevitable by-product of the nuclear power industry
Nuclear power and climate change – theme for July 2011
As well as radioactive wastes, the uranium/nuclear industry releases greenhouse gases, increasing global warming.
At successive steps in the uranium/nuclear cycle, carbon dioxide is released into the atmosphere. This is shown above, with black dots as the carbon rising. The industry also uses enormous amounts of fuel – as electricity and in the huge amounts of oil in transporting uranium, nuclear fuel and wastes.
Nuclear Power and Climate Change – theme for July 2011
Nuclear power and sea level rise – All reactors on sea coasts endangered by sea level rise Over the next hundred years there will be significant sea rises, one meter or more, and many closed nuclear reactor sites could be flooded, including the stored nuclear waste. That could contaminate much of the coast lines for decades.
Nuclear Power and The Tragedy of the Commons – theme for June
There’s not much “commons” left, in this so much privatised world. ”Common land” is disappearing fast, and they haven’t yet found out how to privatise the air, the clouds, and the oceans. So, the air, the rain and the oceans are fair game- for exploiting, and for using as endless rubbish dumps.
image from http://kirbyandfriends.files.wordpress.com/2011/03/underwater_light_and_bubbles_by_della_stock.jpg
With the continuing Fukushima nuclear disaster the focus at present is on the radioactive pollution of the seas.
Nuclear power and the commons of this beautiful world – theme for June
It’s time that human societies made the change – started taking real co-operative action to look after our commons, in this beautiful world. – land, fresh water, air, and oceans. Already, national leaders are under pressure from their people to protect our common interests, rather than the interests of polluting corporations.
If the Fukushima nuclear crisis is doing one good thing, it is making it clear that radioactive pollution is an international problem, not just a problem for Japan.
by photographer Edgar Moskopp http://acidcow.com/pics/14022-our-beautiful-planet-16-pics.html
Nuclear Spin – theme for May 2011
Now the Fukushima nuclear disaster is sort of “off the radar”, as far as the mainstream media is concerned. (even though Fukushima is now turning into a health, environmental and economic continuing catastrophe ) A great relief to the nuclear lobby. They must be getting tired of telling us that ionising radiation is quite OK really, and that now we can look forward to those wonderfully safe new nuclear reactor designs.
Now, the nuclear lobby can go back to its historically tried and tested spin themes. The first of which – is to confuse the public. This is being done with fervour, as they talk about “New Generation” nuclear reactors, “small modular thorium reactors” – make it all scientific – with the message that the ordinary person can’t have a valid opinion on matters nuclear.
Nuclear Spin – theme for May 2011
Now the Fukushima nuclear disaster is sort of “off the radar”, as far as the mainstream media is concerned. (even though Fukushima is now turning into a health, environmental and economic continuing catastrophe ) A great relief to the nuclear lobby. They must be getting tired of telling us that ionising radiation is quite OK really, and that now we can look forward to those wonderfully safe new nuclear reactor designs.
Now the nuclear lobby can go back to its historically tried and tested spin themes
BUSTING the NUCLEAR SPIN – theme for May 2011
Nuclear Spin has suddenly become critically important. The global nuclear industry was failing, anyway. But Fukushima could give it the final fatal blow.
The Nuclear Establishment is now in a panic – spinning furiously on many levels.
A main focus is on downplaying the health effects of ionising radiation. They will tell you that there have been “few deaths” from Chernobyl radiation. They’ll prove it – citing only thyroid cancer. The World Health Organisation, (WHO, hand in glove with the International Atomic Energy Agency, IAEA), counts only thyroid cancer as a result from Chernobyl – not leukaemia, other cancers, or birth defects
As cancer effects from the Chernobyl disaster can be expected around 25 years afterwards, the nuclear mafia point to the early death toll (after 1986) – not to 2011, 0r future years. From this, they then claim that the Fukushima disaster also has had a relatively small effect on health.
At the same time, the Nuclear Establishment works to weaken regulations on ionising radiation, and to push the false idea that low level radiation is benign, even beneficial to human health. Already the Japanese government is changing the rules,to permit higher radiation levels in children as “acceptable.
Marketing nuclear: theme for March: new tactics going on now
The most favoured marketing spiel– the nuclear lobby proclaims that this Japan incident shows the stability of new nuclear power plants. Newer nuclear reactors will withstand earthquakes– no threat to the public. Somehow the incident shows the success of new designs. Any small flaw that let this happen will now be rectified in all future models, and we can all sleep peacefully, near a nuclear reactor
The nuclear marketeers have started the spin already- Christina Macpherson
1. We are already being told that “background” radiation is minimal – so that 8 times that much is unimportant.
(Never mind that “backgroud radiation” might very well have increased over recent years due to depleted uranium – miniscule particles flying around the globe)
2. There is no defect in the actual reactor steel container – so this is not a serious thing – no meltdown, we are told.
3. Evacuation of people, and gathering up and dispensing of iodine pills – these are just precautions, not actually needed, we are told.
4. Above all – it will be argued that this incident shows the stability of new nuclear power plants? Despite a record earthquake, they are said to be not seriously damaged – no threat to the public. Proves the success of new designs. Any small flaw that let this happen will now be rectified in all future models, and we can all sleep peacefully, near a nuclear reactor
5 The Japanese get 39% of their electrcity from nuclear. So it has to go on. (The cost? – Oh don’t let’s worry about that just now.)
Marketing of Nuclear Power Internationally- theme for March 2011
Since I first wrote this theme post, the Fukushima disaster has changed everything.
But the nuclear/uranium lobby will continue – more desperately than ever. They are up against the common sense of the ordinary citizen. Any reasonable person would pause to reflect. But some corporate executives and others, in the good old tradition of the tobacco lobby, will push every old spin and lie, to convince the public that nuclear power is good for them
Marketing nuclear power, like marketing cigarettes, is easier in “Third World” countries. And, it’s getting critically important for the nuclear industry to resuscitate itself – FAST . As more nuclear reactors close down, there’s a panic on to get contracts for new ones.
This selling frenzy isn’t doing too well in countries that already have experience in nuclear power - USA, Russia, UK, France. So – companies like AREVA, Westinghouse, General Electric, Rosatom, Toshiba, Kepco – scramble amongst themselves to convince Asian, Middle Eastern and African countries that they need nuclear power.
With little experience of nuclear, (and having the ambition to get nuclear weapons) Third World countries are a sitting duck for this unscrupulous marketing.
Even better, rising totalitarian powers – learning from China, can well hide the financial and environmental costs from their citizens.
The marketing of nuclear power – theme for March 2011
The nuclear lobby spends undisclosed amounts on spreading its gospel. The message must appeal to all sorts of people. But, importantly, the nuclear message must be spread through “credible” avenues – so, the money and the message are directed towards particular, respectable, sectors.
In this world of global nuclear recession slowly recovering, donations from big corporations are gratefully received, careers are enhanced, pro nuclear people are promoted, grants for nuclear research are given. Grants to the arts enhance the respectability of the nuclear/uranium corporations.
‘We’ve seen it all before, in the tobacco industry promotion – but the nuclear marketing is more urgent, more desperate, as the nuclear industry is waning, rather than reviving.
-
Archives
- May 2012 (262)
- April 2012 (259)
- March 2012 (342)
- February 2012 (304)
- January 2012 (259)
- December 2011 (274)
- November 2011 (331)
- October 2011 (247)
- September 2011 (272)
- August 2011 (249)
- July 2011 (227)
- June 2011 (195)
-
Categories
- 1
- 1 NUCLEAR ISSUES
- business and costs
- climate change
- ENERGY
- environment
- health
- history
- indigenous issues
- Legal
- marketing of nuclear
- media
- opposition to nuclear
- people
- politics
- politics international
- Religion and ethics
- safety and incidents
- secrets,lies and civil liberties
- spinbuster
- technology
- Uranium
- wastes
- weapons and war
- 2 WORLD
- ACTION
- AFRICA
- AUSTRALIA
- Christina background info
- Christina's notes
- Christina's themes
- general
- Reference
- resources – print
- Resources -audiovicual
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS

























