nuclear-news

The News That Matters about the Nuclear Industry Fukushima Chernobyl Mayak Three Mile Island Atomic Testing Radiation Isotope

Cesium – radioactive contamination in Japan

Starr,-StevenI am afraid that there are many Japanese people now living on lands equally Cesium-137
contaminated with radioactive cesium. If Japanese children are allowed to routinely ingest foodstuffs contaminated with Cesium-137, they will likely develop the same health problems that we see now in the children and teenagers of Belarus and Ukraine.

Thus it is very important that we recognize the danger posed to children by the routine ingestion of contaminated food with Cesium-137 where ever they might live. It is also important to prevent further nuclear disasters which release these fiendishly toxic poisons into the global ecosystems. Given the immense amounts of long-lived radionuclides which exist at every nuclear power plant this is an urgent task.

The Implications of The Massive Contamination of Japan With Radioactive Cesium 
Steven Starr  Senior Scientist, Physicians for Social Responsibility  Director, University of Missouri, Clinical Laboratory Science Program Helen Caldicott Foundation Fukushima Symposium  New York Academy of Medicine, 11 March 2013 A large number of highly radioactive isotopes released by the destruction of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant grossly contaminated the Japanese mainland. Most of these radionuclides had short half lives which meant they would essentially disappear in a matter of days or months. For many of those who were exposed to them there will be major health consequences.
However, there were some radioactive elements that will not rapidly disappear. And it is these long-lived radionuclides that will remain to negatively affect the health of all complex life forms that are exposed to them.

text cesiumChief among them is Cesium-137, which has taken on special significance because it is has proven to be the most abundant of the long-lived radionuclides that has remained in the environment following the nuclear disasters at Chernobyl and Fukushima. It has a 30 year radioactive half life which is why it persists in the environment. Scientists now believe that it will be 180 to 320 years before the Cesium-137 around the destroyed Chernobyl reactor actually disappears from the environment.

Cesium is water soluble and quickly makes its way into soils and waters. It is in the same atomic family as potassium and it mimics it, acting as a macronutrient. It quickly becomes ubiquitous in contaminated ecosystems.

It is distributed by the catastrophic accidents at nuclear power plants because large quantities of volatile radioactive cesium build up inside the fuel rods of nuclear reactors. Thus any accident at a nuclear reactor that causes the fuel rods to rupture, melt, or burn will cause the release of highly radioactive cesium gas.

Long-lived radionuclides such as Cesium-137 are something new to us as a species. They did not exist on Earth in any appreciable quantities during the entire evolution of complex life. Although they are invisible to our senses they are millions of times more poisonous than most of the common poisons we are familiar with. They cause cancer, leukemia, genetic mutations, birth defects, malformations, and abortions at concentrations almost below human recognition and comprehension. They are lethal at the atomic or molecular level……….

Sometimes these man-made radionuclides are compared to naturally occurring radionuclides, such as Potassium-40, which is always found in bananas and other fruits. However this is a false comparison since naturally occurring radioactive elements are very weakly radioactive. In the lab chart the radioactivity is described as the “specific activity”. Note that Potassium-40 has a specific activity of 71 ten millionths of a Curie per gram. Compare that to the 88 Curies per gram for Cesium-137. This is like comparing a stick of dynamite to an atomic bomb.

Highly-radioactive fission products such as Cesium-137 and Strontium-90 emit 10 to 20 million times more radiation per unit volume than does Potassium-40. So which one of these would you rather have in your bananas?

It is in fact the amount of Cesium-137 deposited per square kilometer of land that defines the degree to which an area is classified as being too radioactive to work or live. One may get an idea of the extreme toxicity of Cesium-137 by considering how little of it is required to make a large area of land uninhabitable………

as little as one third of a gram of Cesium-137, made into microparticles and distributed as a smoke or gas over an area of one square kilometer, will make that square kilometer uninhabitable.

Less than two grams of Cesium-137, a piece smaller than an American dime, if made into microparticles and evenly distributed as a radioactive gas over an area of one square mile, will turn that square mile into an uninhabitable radioactive exclusion zone. Central Park in New York City can be made uninhabitable by 2 grams of microparticles of Cesium-137. Hard to believe, isn’t it?

Remember, these nuclear poisons are lethal at the atomic level. There are as many atoms in one gram of Cesium-137 as there are grains of sand in all the beaches of the world.

So now that we have some idea of the extreme toxicity of Cesium-137, let’s look at the extent of the contamination of the Japanese mainland.

It is now known that the reactors 1, 2, and 3 at Fukushima Daiichi all melted down and melted through the steel reactor vessels within a few days following the earthquake and tsunami of March 11, 2011. This was not made public by either TEPCO or the Japanese government for two months.

The greatest amounts of highly radioactive gases were released shortly after the meltdowns and 80% of this gas released by the reactors is believed to have traveled away from Japan over the Pacific. However the remaining 20% was dispersed over the Japanese mainland………

Two million people in Belarus live on lands severely contaminated by Cesium-137. Most of the children that live there are not considered to be healthy although they were before the nuclear power plant at Chernobyl exploded in 1986. Fourteen years after the explosion, 45 to 47 percent of high school graduates had physical disorders, including gastro-intestinal anomalies, weakened hearts, and cataracts. And 40% were diagnosed with chronic “blood disorders” and malfunctioning thyroids.

I am afraid that there are many Japanese people now living on lands equally contaminated with radioactive cesium. If Japanese children are allowed to routinely ingest foodstuffs contaminated with Cesium-137, they will likely develop the same health problems that we see now in the children and teenagers of Belarus and Ukraine.

Thus it is very important that we recognize the danger posed to children by the routine ingestion of contaminated food with Cesium-137 where ever they might live. It is also important to prevent further nuclear disasters which release these fiendishly toxic poisons into the global ecosystems. Given the immense amounts of long-lived radionuclides which exist at every nuclear power plant this is an urgent task.  http://www.ratical.org/radiation/Fukushima/StevenStarr.html

September 4, 2015 - Posted by | Japan, radiation, Reference

6 Comments »

  1. As a retired nuclear engineer who eventually saw through the lies & deceit of the nuclear industry to become a member of Greenpeace & anti-nuclear activist, I would like to say my personal thanks to you for this informative post. Please keep up the good work of informing us of the real dangers of nuclear power.

    Comment by Peter Smith | September 5, 2015 | Reply

    • Thank you, Peter Smith. It is most encouraging to receive your support.
      Especially right now. I am going through the submissions to South Australia’s Nuclear Fuel Chain Royal Commission. There are dozens of submissions from engineers, all in favour of nuclear power. They are very knowledgeable people, but they do seem to gloss over questions of heath and environment. I wish that they could turn their attention to Australia’s wonderful potential for energy efficient design, and solar and wind energy. Engineers could save the world.
      It mean s a lot to me to know of a nuclear engineer who can step back and look at the scene more broadly.

      Comment by Christina MacPherson | September 5, 2015 | Reply

      • So pleased to give support. Fighting the nuclear industry can feel like trying to stop the tide! But know that nuclear are on the run and are becoming desperate because they can see, at least those not in a total delusional state, that the Renewables Revolution is the death nail for them. Nuclear power plants are truly amazing places to work in, particularly to an engineer. A very diverse range of technical disciplines, some of it at one time working on the frontiers of technology, then there are chemical and reactor scientists, a very interesting mix. But none of this makes it right. I believe most educated supporters of nuclear are either in a state of denial or deluded or both. Having worked in the power indusfor for 40 years with 30 in the nuclear industry it’s a big step turning my back on nuclear and fossil power, because all my technical expertise is based on large steam turbines most of which is irrelevent in a decentralised, distributed Renewables energy world. But if that’s the way to go and it it, then you have to learn to adapt and change, and I have. My strength has always been to look at the big picture, but it was not until I was in my 50’s that I realised it. I will send you a link to some talks given at anti-nuclear rallies. Do keep in touch, you are an important catalyst for change that the world really needs if we are to get through the challenges of Climate Change.
        Have you seen the fim, The Fourth Revolution – Energy Autonomy by fechnerMEDIA?
        Kind Regards Peter

        Comment by Peter Smith | September 6, 2015

      • Thank you, Peter
        Such an insight – into the need to adapt and change.
        But surely it is not now the case that the skills of nuclear engineers are no longer really relevant.
        If the world closes down nuclear reactors , as is happening to a degree, surely nuclear engineers are much needed, to help with the management of this process, and with the disposal of radioactive trash. And perhaps also to help with developing alternative energy technologies?

        Then there’s the possibility of nuclear fusion – theoretically a wonderfully clean source of energy – but perhaps a mirage, especially as the project is vastly expensive.
        No, I haven’t seen The Fourth Revolution – Energy Autonomy. Shall try to check it out.
        Thanks again for the much appreciated encouragement.

        Comment by Christina MacPherson | September 10, 2015

      • Hi, Great to hear from you again. I will try to explain about experience not being relevent. The old electric power supply industry was based on mainly high pressure steam driven turbo alternators, working at very high temperatures & pressures. The turbo generators are generally all very large 500 to 660 MWatt. This is the technology that will become irrelevent in the future.This is centralised power. Turbine manufacturers, boiler makers, pumps etc. these are common to nuclear & large fossil plant. Yes all the specialist nuclear plant would also not be required, but it’s a much wider range of heavy engineering that has been ‘king’ for many years that would no longer be required. Yes some people will be required to decommission, dismantle nuclear plant, but all the conventional steam turbo alternator & auxiliary plant manufacturers will be out of business. This will be a tough challenge for many, but I do not fear change, I have been through that & am excited by the opportiunities that Renewables offers. I am just trying to get across that there will be 10,000’s who find themselves in the position of having to make big changes & showing empathy.Remember for many knowledge is power, when that knowledge is no longer required many will feel unimportant, loss of status & self esteem etc. That should be managed by governments with vision. The current UK government has very little vision, is led by people motivated by power, status & greed, Completely the wrong persons to being managing change as their biggest fear is loss of personal power on a massive scale.

        Hope that helps, you to sse it is not my fear, but my understanding of some of the challenges ahead for the UK & why here in the UK we are so stuck in an old paradigm.

        Comment by Peter Smith | September 10, 2015

      • Another insightful comment. Thank you, Peter Smith.
        I tried to send you an email – to the email address supplied.

        But my email was rejected:
        “Technical details of permanent failure:
        Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for the recipient domain hotmail.co.uk by mx3.hotmail.com. [65.55.33.119].
        The error that the other server returned was:
        550 Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable.”

        I am reluctant to put my email address on this public site, as I already receive nasty and insulting comments here, and on Twitter.

        Comment by Christina MacPherson | September 10, 2015


Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.