June 5, 2013 8:06 am
Fukushima Radiation Risk Media Deception, Lynda Lovon Sassy musings on science, politics, and culture.3 June 13“……..Huffington post carried a Reuters story No Rise In Cancer Seen From Japan’s Fukushima Nuclear Disaster, UN Says in which they quote a senior member of the committee, Dr.Wolfgang Weiss:
“Weiss, who chairs work on UNSCEAR’s Fukushima report, told reporters that dose levels were “so low that we don’t expect to see any increase in cancer in the future in the population”.”
But who is this Weiss Guy? Who is UNSCEAR and why should I believe what they report? UNSCEAR is subservient to the UN’s International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the global pimp of nuclear power. UNSCEAR, which I like to pronounce “unscare” as it seems that their main purpose is to dispel any concerns about nuclear radiation, are not an autonomous independent agency. Not only is UNSCEAR loaded with scientists in the nuclear industry, every report must be approved by the IAEA. UNSCEAR was strongly criticized by the international scientific community a few years ago with its assessment of the consequences of the Chernobyl accident in which they claimed only 31 people died as a result of radiation. For more information on that coverup, read my blog about it here.
Who is this Weiss guy? Wolfgang Weiss is a boss on Euratom which, according to Wikipedia is an international organisation founded in 1958 with the purpose of creating a specialist market for nuclear power in Europe, developing nuclear energy and distributing it to its member states while selling the surplus to non-member states. Weiss is in the business of promoting nuclear power! Do you trust his opinion on the health effects or consequences of ionizing radiation and nuclear accidents?
More importantly, why didn’t Reuters or Huff Post point this out? They have access to google too. It is unethical and irresponsible for the media to not expose the bias and conflict of interest with these nuclear agencies and agents. It is irresponsible for the media to perpetuate the lie and illusion of neutrality of scientists. But it doesn’t end there……… http://lyndalovon.blogspot.de/2013/06/fukushima-radiation-risk-media-deception.html
Posted by Christina Macpherson
Categories: spinbuster
Tags:
Mobile Site | Full Site
Get a free blog at WordPress.com Theme: WordPress Mobile Edition by Alex King.
[…] source ; https://nuclear-news.net/2013/06/05/unscear-the-publicity-arm-of-the-nuclear-lobby-declares-fukushim… September 10th 2013 Posted by Mia […]
By UNSCEARが被曝による健康被害はなかったという報告を出そうとしている！ UNSCEAR is going to publish a report that says there is no health hazards after the Fukushima disaster! « nuclear-news on September 12, 2013 at 2:32 am
Funny how reading the book: Chernobyl: Consequences of the Catastrophe for People and the Environment, Yablokov and co have papers which show over 90% of liquidators in all regions are classified as sick. The malformations, cancer rates, retardation, disabilities have increased year on year. It’s all in the work in russia that were ignored by the west. The book cites 30,000+ papers, thesis’, reports.,The reports here cited this side of the world are about 300. Talk about choosing your controls.
By itsallies on September 12, 2013 at 8:34 am
In 1959 the World Health Organisation entered into an agreement with the International Atomic Energy Agency which gave the unequivocally pro-nuclear IAEA a veto over WHO research into the effects of radiation.
It is important to bear in mind that the IAEA is dedicated to fostering the spread of nuclear power. That commitment is at the very begining of its constitution.
For fully half a century the WHO has been subservient to IAEA in matters of radiation and health. Under the WHO/IAEA Agreement (WHA12-40) of 28 May 1959, the IAEA has assumed a power of veto over WHO’s activities. Similar “agreements” constrain other UN agencies.
An international campaign opposes this conflict of interest, calling for WHO to be independent of the nuclear lobby.
http://www.llrc.org/health/subtopic/iaeawhoagreement.htm
By Sir Charles on March 17, 2015 at 5:00 am
In 1959 the World Health Organisation entered into an agreement with the International Atomic Energy Agency which gave the unequivocally pro-nuclear IAEA a veto over WHO research into the effects of radiation.
It is important to bear in mind that the IAEA is dedicated to fostering the spread of nuclear power. That commitment is at the very begining of its constitution.
For fully half a century the WHO has been subservient to IAEA in matters of radiation and health. Under the WHO/IAEA Agreement (WHA12-40) of 28 May 1959, the IAEA has assumed a power of veto over WHO’s activities. Similar “agreements” constrain other UN agencies.
An international campaign opposes this conflict of interest, calling for WHO to be independent of the nuclear lobby.
http://nuclear-news.net
By Sir Charles on March 17, 2015 at 5:02 am