nuclear-news

The News That Matters about the Nuclear Industry

Japan’s new “national security” amendment could pave way for nuclear weapons development

 “Is this intended to pave the way for (Japan’s) nuclear armament?”..

‘National security’ amendment to nuclear law raises fears of military use   June 21, 2012 THE ASAHI SHIMBUN Supporters of an amendment quietly slipped into Japan’s nuclear power law saying it should contribute to “national security” are denying it could provide cover for military use of nuclear technology.

The provision, which says nuclear safety should be guaranteed not only to defend lives, people’s health and the environment but also to “contribute to Japan’s national security,” became part of the Atomic Energy Basic Law on June 20.

Critics say the change to the 1955 basic law, known as the “constitution” of nuclear energy use in Japan, was made without proper debate on the sidelines of political maneuvering in the Diet.

However, it could have far-reaching consequences for Japan’s nuclear stance and heighten international concern about the nation’s nuclear recycling program of extracting plutonium from spent nuclear fuel.

A provision mentioning a “contribution to Japan’s national security”
was also included in the Aerospace Basic Law of 2008, which fueled
calls to use artificial satellites for defense purposes.

A law enacted on June 20 to establish a new nuclear regulatory
commission to replace the Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency also
said the commission should “contribute to Japan’s national security.”
None of the changes were widely discussed before they were passed by
the Diet.
During a session of the Upper House Environment Committee on June 20,
one lawmaker asked: “Is this intended to pave the way for (Japan’s)
nuclear armament?”….. the physicist Michiji Konuma, professor
emeritus at Keio University and a member of the Committee of Seven for
World Peace, a Japanese group that is calling for the scrapping of the
amendment, said: “If they insist that it’s all about safeguards, why
don’t they say so explicitly? They used a cryptic expression and left
room for stretched interpretation.”

The “national security” provision was added to Article 2 of the Atomic
Energy Basic Law, which stipulates that the research, development and
use of nuclear power should be conducted “under democratic management
and in an autonomous manner,” and that the results should not be
secret.

The revised law retains the wording that the use of nuclear power
should be limited to peaceful purposes.
http://ajw.asahi.com/article/behind_news/politics/AJ201206210061

About these ads

June 22, 2012 - Posted by | Japan, politics

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 878 other followers

%d bloggers like this: