nuclear-news

latest news on the uranium/nuclear industry

Nuclear power has always been State financed

It was almost exclusively State-controlled, State-financed and State-operated. Its strategic deployment and costs were ultimately linked to the real business of the atom – nuclear weapons making and state security which, of course, was a State secret.

The Atomic Reality At the time when “Funky Town” was regular disco fodder circa 1977, nuclear power generation was still almost totally and exclusively reserved for the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries, the USSR and to a smaller extent, China and India. Read more »

September 30, 2010 Posted by | 2 WORLD, history | , , , , , | Leave a Comment

Paladin and Cameco’s plans for uranium mine foiled by Australia’s Northern Territory govt

NT reversal cruels U-hopefuls’ plans TradingMarkets.com, 29 Sep 2010 –Northern Territory Chief Minister Paul Henderson has withdrawn support for Cameco Corporation’s and Paladin Energy’s proposed uranium mine near Alice Springs. The announcement came just two years after Cameco and Paladin won developmentrights for the Angela Pamela project and two weeks before a local by-election in the seat of Alice Springs.

NT reversal cruels U-hopefuls’ plans | TradingMarkets.com

September 30, 2010 Posted by | AUSTRALIA, politics | , , , | Leave a Comment

Australian Greens take Aboriginals’ anti nuclear cause to Parliament

“We are the Aboriginal people who own the land and the dreamings you are talking about, we are asking that you reject this bill and scrap Muckaty as a site for the waste dump.”

Greens urge rethink of nuclear dump site – ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation), By Megan Lewis Sep 29, 2010 The Greens have urged the Federal Government to scrap plans to build a nuclear waste dump at Muckaty Station in the Northern Territory…… Read more »

September 30, 2010 Posted by | AUSTRALIA, politics | , , , , , , | Leave a Comment

NUCLEAR POLITICS – theme for October 2010

The politics of nuclear power go right back to the early secret research to develop atomic bombs. Ever since, nuclear technology has been intrinsically part of nuclear weaponry.

Governments of the  “nuclear club” – USA, Russia, UK, France, China – all want to keep their nuclear weapons.  Others, India, Pakistan, Israel, North Korea, Iran either already have nuclear weapons, or aspire to them.

“Peaceful” nuclear power is the smokescreen behind the nuclear weapons industry.

But “peaceful” nuclear power is so expensive, that only the tax-payer is in a position to afford it.

Nuclear power today is going ahead only where the government pays for it – China, Russia, France.   But even then, it still looks too costly.

So – today,  the old “nuclear nations” scramble to sell nuclear technology to the “undeveloped” nations.  Today’s nuclear politics are all about competing to sell “peaceful” nuclear technology, while pretending to be  against nuclear weaponry.

This promotion is always couched in terms of “helping countries to get cheap energy”, and “combating global warming”. However, it is pretty obvious that the countries that want nuclear power really want it for weapons development. Meanwhile, the nuclear companies look to establish a profitable enterprise, and, and also to develop power and influence. This is especially noticeable in the case of Russia. But France and the U.S.A also seek to develop a powerful hold on the energy methods of other countries.

At home, governments such as those of the U.S.A., France, U.K., Russia, China, India, Israel … (it’s a growing list) seek to maintain and expand their nuclear weapons arsenal. The push for “peaceful” nuclear power is a mask covering their weapons aims.

September 30, 2010 Posted by | Christina's themes | , , , , , , | Leave a Comment

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 55 other followers